Skip to main content

Security report for bosch-engineering.de

Bosch Engineering · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bosch Engineering GmbH operates as a global development partner specializing in tailored, cross-domain mobility solutions ranging from embedded systems to cloud services. The company is a 100% subsidiary of Robert Bosch GmbH, positioning it strongly within the automotive and transportation engineering sector. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive presentation of their services, targeting OEMs and industry partners with offerings in engineering services, mobility solutions, testing, prototyping, and consulting. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies and integrates Bosch's proprietary content management and UI components, ensuring a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS/TLS support significantly weaken the security posture, exposing visitors to potential risks. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear GDPR-aligned policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but requires urgent security improvements to align with best practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of bosch-engineering.de. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bosch-engineering.de

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bosch-engineering.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bosch-engineering.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bosch Engineering holds a strong market position as a specialized engineering service provider within the Bosch group, focusing on mobility and transportation sectors. Their business model centers on B2B engagements, delivering customized solutions from concept to field operation. The company leverages Bosch's brand strength and global network, participating actively in industry events and maintaining a robust digital presence. Their service portfolio is diverse, covering embedded systems, cloud services, and domain-specific engineering expertise. The website content and linked domains indicate strategic partnerships and a broad industry reach. Growth indicators include continuous event participation and a comprehensive service offering. The absence of direct contact emails suggests a controlled communication channel via contact forms, typical for large enterprises.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which are critical for secure communications. While security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection are implemented, the absence of HTTPS undermines these protections. No vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE were detected, but the missing DMARC record and DNSSEC reduce email and domain security. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating potential gaps in transparency. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, with privacy consent mechanisms in place, reflecting a moderate security culture. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is essential to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable insecure protocols.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and add DMARC records to enhance domain and email security.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit privacy and cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Bosch's e-Spirit CaaS platform. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and uses Swiper.js for interactive carousels. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Hosting is managed internally by Bosch, with DNS servers under bosch.de. Performance metrics were not available, but the site structure and assets suggest moderate to good performance. Technical risks include the lack of HTTPS and TLS support, which could impact user trust and SEO rankings. Opportunities exist to modernize security infrastructure and enhance performance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 69/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bosch-engineering.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bosch-engineering.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.