Skip to main content

Security report for borga.ua

Borga · Real Estate · Ukraine

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Borga is a European construction company specializing in fast-assembly and modular buildings, including hangars, warehouses, and supermarkets. The company targets businesses and individuals in Ukraine seeking efficient and reliable building solutions. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce integration, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and New Relic for performance monitoring. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, demonstrating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policies and terms of service, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some security best practices, but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies. Overall, the site presents a professional image with good technical implementation and moderate privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching borga.ua

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate and construction sector, focusing on prefabricated and modular buildings. Founded in 2015, Borga has positioned itself as a European leader in fast-assembly building solutions. The business model revolves around construction services and turnkey solutions for industrial and commercial clients. The website content and structured data indicate a medium-sized enterprise targeting the Ukrainian market. The use of WooCommerce suggests potential e-commerce capabilities, possibly for related products or services. The company maintains a consistent brand presence online but lacks detailed contact and compliance information on the homepage. The integration of analytics and cookie consent tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration, ensuring encrypted communications. Security monitoring is implemented via New Relic Browser, and cookie consent is actively managed. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness from a security governance perspective. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Borga
Description
Borga — Швидкомонтовні будівлі, Ангари, ангар під ключ, Побудувати ангар, Металевий ангар, Будівництво супермаркету, Будівництво складу, Сталеві будівлі, Модульні будівлі, Металеві будівлі.
Key services
Fast-assembly buildings, Hangars, Turnkey hangars, Supermarket construction, Warehouse construction, Steel buildings, Modular buildings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, WooCommerce 9.9.4, jQuery 2.1.3, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, New Relic Browser monitoring, Photoswipe, Bravo Cloudflare Video plugin, Typekit Fonts, Google Fonts, Icomoon Icons
Frameworks
WordPress, WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Use of security monitoring tools (New Relic)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, New Relic Browser
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional WordPress-based site for a construction company specializing in fast-assembly buildings.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage HTML content.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Use of multiple modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of malicious content or security blocking.
  7. Structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for SEO and rich snippets.
  8. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with WooCommerce, utilizing a variety of third-party libraries and services including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, and New Relic. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement and integrates multiple font services and icon libraries. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. The technical stack is well-maintained but could benefit from updated jQuery versions and improved security headers. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, suggesting potential for further infrastructure transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with borga.ua. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review borga.ua.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.