Skip to main content

Security report for bontempo.de

bontempo GmbH & Co. KG · Retail · Germany

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bontempo GmbH & Co. KG is a medium-sized German agency and manufactory specializing in retail design, exhibition construction, shopfitting, and event services across Europe. The company positions itself as a creative partner turning spaces into brand experiences, serving a diverse clientele including notable brands in retail and events. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and uses Matomo for analytics with device fingerprinting. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though some accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, additional security headers and a formal security policy or incident response contact are absent. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence with minor areas for security and technical enhancement. The domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency, reinforcing business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bontempo.de

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
43
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bontempo operates in the retail and exhibition sectors, offering design and manufacturing services that cater to retail stores, trade fairs, and events. Their business model combines agency consulting with in-house production capabilities, enabling end-to-end project delivery. The company targets European businesses seeking high-quality retail and exhibition solutions. Their client portfolio includes reputable brands such as Philips, Airbus, and Peek & Cloppenburg, indicating strong market positioning and partnership networks. The website content and client logos suggest a focus on quality and innovation, supporting growth and competitive advantage in their niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner that complies with GDPR requirements. The use of Matomo analytics with device fingerprinting is disclosed transparently. However, the absence of advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No signs of vulnerabilities or data leaks were found. The site does not expose sensitive information and follows best practices for user privacy. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced with formalized policies and additional technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Optimize website performance for faster loading times and improved user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
bontempo GmbH & Co. KG
Registration number
Chamber of Commerce
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
bontempo GmbH & Co. KG
Description
We turn spaces into statements and brands into experiences - as an agency and manufactory for retail, trade fair and event we operate in all of Europe.
Key services
Retail Design, Exhibition construction, Shopfitting, Event management, Furniture production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, Revolution Slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. No direct email or phone contact found in HTML; contact likely via contact page form.
  4. Client logos indicate reputable partnerships.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  6. Use of Matomo analytics with device fingerprinting noted.
  7. No social media links explicitly found in HTML content.
  8. No explicit business registration or VAT numbers found in visible content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, including the Revolution Slider plugin for dynamic content. Matomo analytics is employed for user tracking with device fingerprinting. The site is mobile-responsive and SEO-optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, suggesting potential for optimization. Accessibility is basic, indicating room for improvement to comply with standards. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bontempo.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bontempo.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.