Skip to main content

Security report for bolderajasdraudze.lv

Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskās baznīcas Bolderājas draudze · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskās baznīcas Bolderājas draudze is a small, local non-profit religious organization serving the Latvian Lutheran community in Riga. The website provides information about church services, religious education, community events, and donation options. It is hosted on WordPress.com and uses standard WordPress technologies with Jetpack integration. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation for its target audience. However, it lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but security headers are missing. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its community purpose effectively but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bolderajasdraudze.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a religious non-profit focused on community engagement and spiritual services. Its market position is local and community-centric, with key services including worship, religious education, and ceremonies. The business model relies on donations and volunteer participation. The website's integration with Facebook and WordPress.com indicates a modest digital presence. There are no indications of commercial activities beyond donations. The lack of detailed WHOIS data limits deeper business verification. The organization appears stable with consistent branding and active content updates.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The site uses Jetpack, which provides some security features. There is no evidence of a formal incident response or vulnerability disclosure process. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved with additional headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding contact emails and phone numbers explicitly for better user trust and support.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskās baznīcas Bolderājas draudze
Registration number
99500001244
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvijas Evaņģēliski luteriskās baznīcas Bolderājas draudze
Description
Bolderājas draudze is a religious non-profit organization focused on fostering community and spiritual growth within the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Latvia. It offers worship services, religious education, and community events.
Key services
Weekly worship services, Religious education (Sunday school, Alpha course), Religious ceremonies (baptisms, weddings, funerals), Community events and celebrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Jetpack, PHP, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
WordPress.com hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of WordPress security plugins (Jetpack)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com stats pixel
Marketing tools
Jetpack sharing buttons
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress.com hosted blog for a local Latvian Lutheran church community.
  2. Content is in Latvian language and focused on church activities, events, and community news.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact emails explicitly listed on homepage; contact form likely on contact page.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  6. No phone numbers found with clear company context.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook page linked in footer.
  8. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificate.
  9. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS hosted on WordPress.com, leveraging Jetpack for additional functionality. It uses modern web standards including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for moderate performance. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is standard for small non-profit organizations and is well maintained. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bolderajasdraudze.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bolderajasdraudze.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.