Skip to main content

Security report for bokoloco.com

Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.bokoloco.com is a Japanese language content site focused on skincare recommendations specifically for dry skin cleansing products. It provides detailed articles explaining product types, moisturizing ingredients, and usage tips aimed at individuals with dry and sensitive skin. The business model appears to be content-driven, likely monetized through affiliate marketing or advertising, targeting a niche audience interested in beauty and skincare products. Technically, the site uses standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is accessible over HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy or cookie policies. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO practices are minimal but present. User tracking is implemented via Research Artisan Pro scripts, indicating moderate user analytics. From a security perspective, the site has a basic SSL configuration but lacks important security headers that could improve protection against common web threats. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. The WHOIS lookup failed to return domain registration details, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the website is functional with good content quality but has moderate technical and security maturity. The lack of registrant data and privacy compliance reduces trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy disclosures, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance the site's credibility and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bokoloco.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates in the retail sector focusing on skincare product recommendations for dry skin. It targets Japanese-speaking consumers seeking advice on cleansing products. The business model is content and affiliate marketing-based, with revenue likely generated through referrals and advertising. The site maintains a niche market position with no evident parent company or subsidiaries. External links suggest partnerships or affiliate relationships with various unrelated domains. Growth indicators and detailed business registration information are not available, limiting deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security detected. No explicit incident response or security policies are published. The site uses tracking scripts that may impact privacy compliance. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces transparency and trust. No critical vulnerabilities were found, but improvements in security best practices and compliance are needed to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and mitigate risks.
  5. Improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility to enhance user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website provides detailed information and recommendations about cleansing products suitable for dry skin, focusing on product types, moisturizing ingredients, and usage tips to maintain healthy skin.
Key services
Skincare product reviews, Ranking and recommendation articles
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Research Artisan Pro
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Research Artisan Pro
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is limited to a contact form with no explicit emails or phone numbers.
  4. Website is in Japanese language focused on skincare for dry skin.
  5. No social media links or company contact emails found.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain status.
  7. Site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  8. Tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro are present, indicating user analytics and tracking.
  9. External links point to various unrelated domains, possibly affiliate or advertising related.
  10. No visible business certifications or security policies disclosed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without use of a known CMS or advanced frameworks. It loads external tracking scripts from Research Artisan Pro for analytics. The site is served over HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical link present. No hosting provider or platform details are evident from the content. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist to improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bokoloco.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bokoloco.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.