Skip to main content

Security report for boglearchitects.com

Bogle Architects Ltd · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bogle Architects Ltd is a small, creative architectural firm founded in 2012 and based in London, UK. The company focuses on progressive and innovative architectural design, serving clients seeking imaginative building solutions. Their market position is that of a niche, award-recognized design consultancy within the real estate sector. The website is professionally designed using the Squarespace platform, featuring good content quality and clear contact information. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Typekit fonts, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is presumably enabled, no explicit security headers were detected, and no incident response or security policy information is provided. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent banner and minimal privacy policy content. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which raises some concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and contact details appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site scores well in content and business credibility but should improve security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching boglearchitects.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector, providing architectural design services with a focus on creativity and innovation. Their business model is service-based, targeting clients who require bespoke architectural solutions. The firm is part of the Bogle Design Group, indicating a parent company relationship. The website's presence on Squarespace suggests a cost-effective digital strategy suitable for small businesses. The use of Instagram as a social channel supports brand visibility and client engagement. The lack of WHOIS data is unusual and may indicate domain privacy or recent registration, which should be monitored. The company maintains clear terms of service and return policies for products, indicating some e-commerce or merchandise activity. Overall, the business shows signs of professionalism and niche market positioning but could benefit from enhanced digital trust signals and security disclosures.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, indicating basic security and privacy awareness. However, no HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, as it may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response policies with contact information to increase transparency and readiness.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bogle Architects Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bogle Architects Ltd
Description
Bogle Architects was founded in 2012 by Ian Bogle and consists of a highly creative group of individuals sharing a common desire to design and build progressive, imaginative and innovative architecture.
Key services
architectural design, progressive and innovative building design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google Analytics, Typekit Fonts, Google Fonts
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • cookie consent banner implemented
  • no exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace platform with professional design.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone.
  3. Privacy and terms policies exist but privacy policy is minimal and not comprehensive.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. No WHOIS data available, raising questions about domain registration status.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe and professional.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking with cookie consent banner present.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace platform, leveraging its CMS and hosting infrastructure. It uses modern web fonts from Typekit and Google Fonts, and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, typical for Squarespace-hosted sites. Accessibility features are basic but present. No custom frameworks or complex backend technologies were detected. The lack of explicit security headers and minimal privacy disclosures represent technical debt and compliance gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable and suitable for a small professional services firm but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with boglearchitects.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review boglearchitects.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.