Skip to main content

Security report for body-attack.at

Body Attack Sports Nutrition · Retail · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Body Attack Sports Nutrition operates a professional e-commerce platform specializing in fitness nutrition products such as protein powders, creatine, amino acids, and workout boosters. The company targets fitness enthusiasts and athletes primarily in German-speaking countries, emphasizing quality with a 'Made in Germany' label and 30 years of experience. The website is well-branded, consistent, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and mobile optimization. Technically, the site leverages Shopware CMS, Google Tag Manager, and other modern web technologies with lazy loading to enhance performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent management, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained but would benefit from publishing comprehensive privacy, terms, and security policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching body-attack.at

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
88
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the fitness nutrition retail sector with a medium-sized operation focused on e-commerce sales. Its competitive advantages include a long-standing brand presence, German manufacturing emphasis, and a broad product portfolio covering multiple supplement categories. Revenue streams are primarily from direct online sales. The target customer segment includes fitness and health-conscious consumers in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. The company maintains sister domains for different regional markets, indicating a structured international presence. Strategic partnerships with payment providers like Mollie and search enhancement via Doofinder support operational efficiency. Growth indicators include active marketing via Google Ads and Facebook Pixel tracking. The business ecosystem appears stable with room for enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of consent-based tracking mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern frameworks and lazy loading scripts contributes to a secure and performant environment. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing clear incident response channels to enhance security culture and compliance with regulations such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and clearly link it on the website.
  2. Add terms of service and cookie policy pages to improve legal compliance.
  3. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Establish and publish incident response contact information and a vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Body Attack Sports Nutrition
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Body Attack Sports Nutrition
Description
BODY ATTACK - Fitness Online Shop: Sportnahrung & Diät Produkte, Fitness & Muskelaufbau.
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Mollie (payment integration), Doofinder (search), Bootstrap Carousel, SVG icons, Lazy loading scripts
Frameworks
Shopware storefront, Bootstrap (carousel)
Platforms
E-commerce platform (Shopware)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google Tag Manager with consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Lazy loading of scripts to improve performance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Doofinder search analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for fitness nutrition products
  2. Content is in German targeting Austrian and German-speaking markets
  3. Good use of structured data and SEO metadata
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  5. Consent mechanism for cookies and ads is implemented
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contacts
  7. Use of modern e-commerce technologies and lazy loading for performance
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Shopware e-commerce platform, utilizing modern web technologies such as lazy loading, SVG icons, and Bootstrap components for responsive design. Google Tag Manager and Mollie payment integration indicate a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with optimizations like deferred JavaScript loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. However, some technical debt is evident in missing security headers and incomplete privacy/legal documentation. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security configurations to reduce risk and enhance compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with body-attack.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review body-attack.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.