Skip to main content

Security report for bocovan.be

Bocovan · Real Estate · Belgium

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bocovan is a small engineering bureau specializing in the management and supervision of new construction and renovation projects, primarily serving the Kortrijk region in Belgium. Their services focus on industrial projects, high-rise warehouses, offices, and apartments. The website presents a professional image with clear business descriptions and regional targeting. Technically, the site uses a modest technology stack including jQuery 1.9.1, Google Analytics, and a custom slider, built on the Plenso CMS platform. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and use of an outdated JavaScript library, and no explicit HTTPS or SSL configuration details were found. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no GDPR indicators are present. The WHOIS data is restricted and unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security, privacy compliance, and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bocovan.be

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bocovan.be, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bocovan.be right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bocovan operates in the real estate sector as an essential entity providing engineering and project management services for construction projects. Their market position is regional with a focus on Kortrijk and surrounding areas. The business model centers on specialized project supervision for new builds and renovations, targeting construction promoters and coordinators. The company appears to have a straightforward service offering without visible partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely derive from project management contracts. The website content and branding are consistent and relevant to their target audience. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information on the site limits deeper business intelligence insights.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied but not explicitly confirmed. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.9.1) poses potential vulnerabilities. No forms or input fields were found, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. There is no visible incident response or security contact information. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie or privacy policies, which may expose the company to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to update libraries, implement security headers, and improve privacy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify via security headers.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve user trust.
  3. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear incident response and security contact information on the website.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bocovan
Description
BOCOVAN is een Ingenieursbureau dat gespecialiseerd is in het opvolgen van zowel NIEUWBOUW- als RENOVATIEPROJECTEN - INDUSTRIÊLE PROJECTEN - HOOGBOUWMAGAZIJNEN - KANTOREN - APPARTEMENTEN,...
Key services
Nieuwbouw opvolging, Renovatieprojecten opvolging, Industrieprojecten, Hoogbouwmagazijnen, Kantoren, Appartementen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, Google Analytics, Loctek slider, Google Fonts (Roboto Condensed)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is restricted and unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information limited to email in meta tags; no phone or physical address found.
  5. Website uses older jQuery version (1.9.1) which may have security risks.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible privacy disclosures.
  7. Website content is in Dutch (nl-be) targeting regional construction project clients.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage or in provided HTML content.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Plenso CMS platform and uses jQuery 1.9.1, Google Analytics, and a custom Loctek slider for UI elements. The site loads a Google font (Roboto Condensed) and uses CSS for responsive design. Performance is moderate with some optimization via PageSpeed (indicated by .pagespeed. in asset URLs). Mobile optimization is good with responsive meta tags and CSS media queries. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. The site does not expose forms or user input fields, limiting data collection but also reducing interactivity. Hosting provider and SSL details are not disclosed in the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bocovan.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bocovan.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.