Skip to main content

Security report for boardable.com

Boardable · Non-profit · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Boardable is a specialized SaaS provider offering a comprehensive board management platform tailored for nonprofit organizations. The company has established a strong market position since its founding in 2009, focusing on streamlining nonprofit board operations through integrated video conferencing, agenda building, document management, and AI-powered tools. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent content quality, professional design, and clear navigation aimed at nonprofit executives, administrators, and board members. Technically, the site is built on WordPress and leverages a robust technology stack including HubSpot for marketing automation, multiple analytics platforms (Heap, Hotjar, Google Analytics), and various advertising and tracking pixels. The hosting infrastructure appears reliable with AWS DNS services. Performance and mobile optimization are excellent, supporting a seamless user experience. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, employs domain locking mechanisms, and integrates security best practices, though DNSSEC is not enabled. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Overall, Boardable presents a low-risk profile with a strong business credibility, good security posture, and compliance maturity. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security policy, and adding a vulnerability disclosure channel to further enhance trust and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching boardable.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
87
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Boardable operates in the nonprofit sector, providing essential board management software that addresses the unique needs of nonprofit boards. Its SaaS business model targets nonprofit organizations, board leaders, and administrators, offering tools that improve meeting efficiency, collaboration, and governance. The company benefits from a focused niche market with competitive advantages such as AI integration and accessibility features. The presence of customer testimonials and trusted nonprofit clients reinforces its market credibility. The company leverages partnerships with marketing and analytics providers to optimize customer acquisition and engagement. Growth indicators include continuous feature expansion and active content marketing through blogs, case studies, and educational resources.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain registration locked against unauthorized transfers or updates. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap. The site uses asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts to reduce performance impact and potential security risks. No exposed credentials or sensitive information were found in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency for security researchers and customers. The extensive use of third-party tracking and advertising scripts requires careful privacy management, which appears addressed through cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved with formalized security documentation and vulnerability disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@boardable.com).
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts for security and privacy compliance to minimize risk.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Boardable
Description
Boardable is the board management software designed specifically for nonprofits. It helps nonprofits collaborate, streamline operations, and focus on mission-critical meetings with features like integrated video conferencing, agenda building, e-signatures, and AI-powered tools.
Key services
Board management platform, Integrated video conferencing, Agenda builder, Document center, Task manager, Polls and voting, AI-powered meeting summaries
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Hotjar, Heap Analytics, Facebook Pixel, StackAdapt, ZoomInfo Pixel, AWS DNS
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
HubSpot CRM and marketing tools
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with transfer and update prohibitions
  • No DNSSEC enabled (potential improvement area)
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Heap Analytics, Hotjar, Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity, G2 Crowd Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Google Ads, Bing Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Heap Analytics, Hotjar, ZoomInfo Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, G2 Crowd Tracking
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking mechanisms.
  2. Strong focus on nonprofit board management with AI-enhanced features.
  3. Comprehensive SEO and metadata implementation.
  4. Multiple marketing and analytics tools integrated with consent mechanisms.
  5. No exposed sensitive data or security misconfigurations detected.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term business operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern and well-structured front-end. It uses HubSpot extensively for marketing automation, forms, and feedback collection. Analytics tools include Heap, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, and Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager, indicating a sophisticated approach to user behavior analysis. The site is hosted on infrastructure likely backed by AWS, as indicated by DNS servers. Performance optimizations such as font preloading, lazy loading of images, and asynchronous script loading are implemented. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with clear semantic HTML and ARIA roles. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities for modernization including DNSSEC adoption and enhanced security documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with boardable.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review boardable.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.