Skip to main content

Security report for bnsflogistics.com

BNSF Logistics · Transportation · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, DNS health and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BNSF Logistics is a well-established third party logistics company specializing in complex supply chain and transportation solutions. As a subsidiary of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC, a Berkshire Hathaway company, it leverages extensive industry expertise and financial resources to deliver multimodal logistics services including rail, heavy haul, flatbed, warehousing, and project management. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, providing a professional user experience and clear business messaging. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS domain registration data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain legitimacy. Security posture is generally strong with HTTPS and tracking opt-outs, but the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and incident response policies, which are recommended for compliance and trust. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and business-focused, serving a broad audience in transportation and energy sectors.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 20 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bnsflogistics.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a comprehensive logistics partner with a portfolio of custom solutions tailored to complex and large-scale moves. Its affiliation with Berkshire Hathaway enhances market credibility. The business model focuses on personalized brokerage and engineering services across multiple transportation modes. The website's content and navigation target business clients in energy, manufacturing, and industrial sectors, emphasizing advanced technical problem-solving and consultative process simplification. The presence of a dedicated careers portal and resource center indicates organizational maturity and growth orientation. The company leverages partnerships and digital marketing tools to maintain competitive advantage and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager with opt-out capabilities, indicating awareness of privacy and tracking concerns. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no published security or incident response policy. The lack of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests limited transparency in security incident handling. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate to good but could be improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to increase transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BNSF Logistics
Description
BNSF Logistics is a technology and people driven third party logistics company providing smart, creative supply chain solutions. They offer custom logistics solutions including transportation, engineering, inventory management, distribution, handling, and risk management.
Key services
Transportation (Rail, Heavy-Haul, Flatbed), Engineering Services, Project Management, Logistics Centers, Cross-Border Solutions, Facility Relocation and Machine Moving, Warehousing, Customer Experience, Reverse Logistics
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin), jQuery, Google Tag Manager, ZoomInfo Pixel
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with opt-out mechanisms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ZoomInfo Pixel
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights, HubSpot WordPress plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on homepage or header navigation.
  3. Contact information is available via contact page and social media links.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which reduces domain trust.
  6. Use of modern WordPress plugins and SEO tools indicates good digital maturity.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is business-focused.
  8. Tracking and analytics scripts are present with opt-out mechanisms.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and several Jet plugins, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. SEO is enhanced with Yoast SEO Premium, and analytics are managed via MonsterInsights and Google Tag Manager. The site loads multiple external scripts including jQuery and fonts from Google, and uses asynchronous loading for performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. However, performance could be further optimized by reducing external dependencies and improving caching. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bnsflogistics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bnsflogistics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.