Skip to main content

Security report for blookanoo.com

Bloo Kanoo · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bloo Kanoo is a technology company founded in 2020 that provides a live shopping platform targeted at brands and retailers. Their service enables interactive and engaging shopping experiences, positioning them as a niche player in the live shopping technology market. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, and integrates modern analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and LogRocket. The technical infrastructure is modern and moderately optimized for performance and mobile use. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Business credibility is moderate with professional content but missing explicit contact details and security policies. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security, and transparency measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blookanoo.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
70
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention blookanoo.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for blookanoo.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bloo Kanoo operates a B2B SaaS business model focusing on live shopping solutions for brands and retailers. Their market positioning is as a specialized technology provider in the e-commerce and retail sector. The company leverages partnerships with cloud providers like AWS and uses popular marketing and analytics tools to support growth. The absence of detailed business contact information and compliance documentation suggests a small to medium-sized enterprise in early growth stages. The company targets brands and retailers seeking to enhance customer engagement through live shopping experiences. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found. The website content and branding are consistent and professionally presented, supporting a credible market presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks DNSSEC, which could improve DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, representing an area for improvement. The use of deferred and async script loading is a positive performance and security practice. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. The absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen browser security.
  4. Publish explicit security and incident response policies including contact channels for reporting vulnerabilities or abuse.
  5. Include clear and verified contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user confidence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bloo Kanoo
Description
Bloo Kanoo provides live shopping solutions targeted at brands and retailers, enabling interactive and engaging shopping experiences.
Key services
Live shopping platform, Interactive shopping experiences, Brand and retailer engagement tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, LogRocket, Yoast SEO, AWS DNS hosting
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No DNSSEC
  • Use of deferred and async script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LogRocket
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), LogRocket
Marketing tools
LogRocket
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML content.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML content.
  4. Use of Google Tag Manager and LogRocket indicates some level of user behavior tracking.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy detected.
  6. No explicit security or incident response contact information found.
  7. Website content is business-focused and professional.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is valid and not privacy protected.
  10. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Elementor page builder, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. Hosting is provided by Amazon AWS, ensuring reliable infrastructure. The site uses Google Tag Manager and LogRocket for analytics and session monitoring, reflecting a data-driven approach to user experience optimization. Performance optimizations include lazy loading of scripts and fonts. SEO is supported by the Yoast SEO plugin, with appropriate meta tags and structured data. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers are technical gaps. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with room for security and privacy enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blookanoo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blookanoo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.