Skip to main content

Security report for blizksobe.cz

Nadace BLÍŽKSOBĚ · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nadace BLÍŽKSOBĚ is a Czech non-profit foundation dedicated to supporting organizations and individuals that enhance social quality of life, focusing on education, democracy, and civil society. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear mission statements and support for known social initiatives such as Člověk v tísni. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap and uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for security. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap given GDPR relevance. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust verification and reduces overall credibility. No signs of WAF or content blocking were detected, and the site content is safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blizksobe.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
50
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on social cohesion and education in the Czech Republic. It targets socially conscious individuals and organizations. Its business model revolves around grant-making and running initiatives to support social causes. The website indicates partnerships with reputable organizations, enhancing its market position. The content and design reflect a small but professional entity with consistent branding and trust signals such as annual reports. Revenue streams are likely from donations and grants. The foundation’s ecosystem includes partnerships with organizations like Člověk v tísni, indicating a collaborative approach to social impact.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA implemented to protect forms. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with better policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Publish a security incident response policy and provide dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerability risks.
  5. Enhance transparency and trust by providing more detailed business and compliance information on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Nadace BLÍŽKSOBĚ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nadace BLÍŽKSOBĚ
Description
Nadace BLÍŽKSOBĚ supports organizations and individuals who improve quality of life and social cohesion. It focuses on modern education development, strengthening democracy and civil society, and protecting freedom.
Key services
Grant support to organizations, Own initiatives in education and social cohesion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, FontAwesome, jQuery
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Czech with English version available.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy pages found despite GDPR relevance.
  4. Contact information includes physical address and contact form but no explicit emails or phone numbers.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and standard security practices like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework for responsive design. It integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google and FontAwesome. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 52/100Medium31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blizksobe.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blizksobe.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.