Skip to main content

Security report for blix.pl

Retail · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blix.pl is a Polish online platform specializing in aggregating promotional leaflets and offers from a wide range of retail stores, primarily targeting general consumers in Poland who seek to stay updated on discounts and promotions. The website offers categorized browsing by stores and product types, along with features such as shopping list management. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Plausible Analytics, and implements a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations. The site is hosted under a reputable registrar and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. However, it lacks publicly accessible privacy policies, terms of service, and direct contact information, which are important for full compliance and user trust. Security headers are not evident, and DNSSEC is not enabled, indicating areas for improvement in security posture. Overall, the website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with moderate tracking and advertising transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blix.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Blix.pl operates in the retail sector as an aggregator of promotional leaflets, serving as a valuable resource for consumers looking for deals across multiple store brands in Poland. Its business model revolves around providing free access to current promotional content, likely monetized through advertising and affiliate partnerships. The platform covers a broad range of retail categories including groceries, home goods, electronics, and fashion, positioning itself as a comprehensive shopping aid. Founded in 2014, it has established a medium-sized presence in the Polish market. The use of multiple tracking and advertising technologies suggests a mature marketing ecosystem. However, the absence of explicit business contact details and legal documents may limit trust for some users and partners.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that allows users to customize their privacy preferences. The use of reputable third-party analytics and advertising services is balanced with user privacy controls. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, absence of DNSSEC, and no visible incident response or security policy documentation indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site would benefit from enhanced security configurations and transparent security policies to improve resilience and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incidents.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Wszystkie aktualne gazetki promocyjne w jednym miejscu - już nie musisz zbierać makulatury. Bądź zawsze na bieżąco z promocjami i oszczędzaj z Blixem!
Key services
Aggregation of promotional leaflets, Search and browsing of offers by store and product categories, Shopping list management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes cookie consent, Plausible Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed preferences
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Plausible Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Google Ads (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Plausible Analytics
Marketing tools
CookieYes
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Polish retail promotional leaflet aggregator.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in provided content.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed categories and user preferences.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Uses modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Plausible.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  7. No evidence of WAF or content blocking.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is not privacy protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with integrations for Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Plausible Analytics, indicating a focus on data-driven marketing and user behavior analysis. The site is mobile-optimized and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. Hosting appears to be managed by cyber_Folks S.A., a known Polish registrar and hosting provider. The site lacks visible CMS identification but uses structured HTML with meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO. Performance is moderate with some room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The cookie consent implementation is detailed and user-friendly, supporting GDPR compliance efforts.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blix.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blix.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.