Skip to main content

Security report for blessingisrael.online

Blessing Israel Foundation · Non-profit · Russia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blessing Israel Foundation is a small non-profit organization founded in 2018, focused on supporting Israel and Christian communities through evangelism, prayer organization, and aid to repatriated Christians and churches. The website serves as an informational platform targeting individuals interested in charitable support for Israel. Technically, the site uses a modern but basic tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Slick Carousel, hosted on Beget servers with HTTPS enabled. However, it lacks advanced security headers and privacy policies, which impacts its security posture and privacy compliance. Analytics are conducted via Yandex.Metrika, indicating a focus on Russian-speaking audiences. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed but requires improvements in security and compliance documentation to enhance trust and protection.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blessingisrael.online

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector with a niche focus on Israel-related Christian charitable activities. Its market position is modest, targeting a specific audience of supporters and donors. The business model relies on donations and community engagement, with no visible e-commerce or transactional services on the site. The organization maintains a limited social media presence primarily on VKontakte and YouTube. The lack of detailed contact information and absence of privacy and cookie policies may limit donor confidence and regulatory compliance. Growth potential could be enhanced by improving transparency and expanding outreach channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response or security contact information is provided. The domain uses privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. The security score is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard web security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security-related inquiries.
  4. Consider publishing a terms of service and security policy page to clarify user and data handling practices.
  5. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and reduce risk of DNS spoofing.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blessing Israel Foundation
Description
The Blessing Israel Foundation was created by friends of Israel from different countries who love the Jewish people and wish to bless it. Objectives include evangelism development in Israel, organization of prayer for Israel, help to repatriated Christians, and support to Christian churches.
Key services
Evangelism Development in Israel, Organization of prayer for Israel, Help to repatriated Christians, Help to Christian churches
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex.Metrika
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex.Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage.
  3. Social media presence limited to VKontakte and YouTube; Facebook and Instagram links commented out.
  4. No forms detected on the homepage; no data collection fields present.
  5. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  6. Yandex.Metrika used for analytics, indicating Russian audience targeting.
  7. Content is primarily informational about the foundation and its objectives.
  8. No visible certifications or security compliance frameworks mentioned.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. No data protection officer or incident response contacts provided.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 4, jQuery 3.3.1, and Slick Carousel for UI components and sliders. FontAwesome is used for icons. The site is hosted on Beget servers with domain name servers ns1.beget.com and ns1.beget.pro. The site loads asynchronously Yandex.Metrika for analytics. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive design elements for mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization is minimal with limited meta descriptions and keywords. No CMS or advanced frameworks detected. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts but could benefit from optimization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blessingisrael.online. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blessingisrael.online.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.