Skip to main content

Security report for bledina.com

Blédina · Retail · France

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blédina is a well-established French baby food brand offering a wide range of products, recipes, and parenting advice targeted at infants and toddlers aged 4/6 to 36 months. The website demonstrates a strong market position with a focus on natural ingredients, sustainability, and consumer engagement through an e-commerce platform and a dedicated mobile app. The brand holds a B Corp certification, underscoring its commitment to social and environmental responsibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap 4 and uses popular JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Glide.js for UI components. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and rich content. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though security headers could be improved. WHOIS data is not publicly available, likely due to privacy protection, but the website's professionalism and transparency, including product recall notices and contact options, support its legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: mail.hostersi.pl

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bledina.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
90
Email security
80
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Blédina operates in the retail sector specializing in baby food products and related services. Its business model combines product sales via e-commerce with content marketing and consumer support. The company targets parents and caregivers, offering tailored nutrition advice and recipes. The brand's long history since 1881 and B Corp certification provide competitive advantages emphasizing quality and sustainability. Partnerships with laboratories and experts enhance credibility. The presence of a dedicated app and active social media channels indicate a mature digital strategy. Growth indicators include new product launches and consumer engagement initiatives. The company maintains transparency through product recall communications and accessible contact channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and cookie consent mechanisms indicate GDPR compliance. However, no explicit security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected in the provided data, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. The site uses third-party scripts such as TagCommander and Google Ads, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, suggesting limited transparency in these areas. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a retail e-commerce site but could be enhanced with additional security controls and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance data protection practices by appointing and publicly listing a Data Protection Officer (DPO) contact.
  5. Continue to maintain and improve privacy compliance mechanisms, including detailed cookie management and data retention disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blédina
Description
Blédina offers baby food products, recipes, and advice tailored for infants aged 4/6 to 36 months. The brand emphasizes natural ingredients, French sourcing, and sustainability.
Key services
Baby food product sales, Recipe and nutrition advice, Consumer support and engagement, Mobile app for personalized baby nutrition guidance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 4, Glide.js slider, TagCommander, WordPress REST API
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
TagCommander
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking, TagCommander
Marketing tools
TagCommander
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking.
  2. Strong focus on baby food products and parenting advice.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable publicly, possibly due to privacy protection.
  6. Active social media presence and consumer engagement.
  7. Includes product recall notice demonstrating transparency and consumer safety focus.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 4 framework and uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Glide.js for interactive UI elements such as sliders. TagCommander is used for tag management and analytics, alongside Google Ads for advertising and retargeting. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preloads fonts for performance. The presence of REST API endpoints indicates modern backend architecture. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading times and asset optimization. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and Twitter card metadata. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bledina.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bledina.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.