Skip to main content

Security report for blackboxbranding.dk

Blackbox Branding · Retail · Denmark

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Blackbox Branding is a Danish company specializing in the production and development of promotional and fundraising game products such as scratch cards, advent calendars, lotteries, and security printing solutions. Established in 2011 and operating as part of Bording Danmark A/S, the company serves businesses and organizations across Scandinavia, providing marketing and fundraising tools with a focus on physical and digital game concepts. Their product portfolio includes tickets, code cards, direct mails, gift cards with effects, and marketing game terminals, positioning them as a niche B2B service provider in the retail and promotional marketing sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with Google Analytics and Tag Manager integrated for user tracking. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though performance is moderate. Security practices include HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism, but there is room for improvement in security headers and DNSSEC implementation. No explicit security or incident response policies are published. The security posture is adequate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but enhancements in security headers and formal policies would strengthen their defense and compliance stance. The domain registration is consistent with the business history, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the website reflects a professional and credible business with solid digital maturity but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance transparency. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and conducting regular security audits of third-party scripts to mitigate risks and improve trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blackboxbranding.dk

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention blackboxbranding.dk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for blackboxbranding.dk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Blackbox Branding holds a stable market position as a specialized supplier of promotional and fundraising game products in Scandinavia, leveraging its parent company Bording Danmark A/S for credibility and operational support. Their business model focuses on B2B engagements with companies, advertising agencies, and organizations requiring customized marketing and fundraising solutions. Revenue streams likely derive from product sales, rental of marketing terminals, and service contracts. The company targets organizations involved in fundraising, retail marketing, and event promotions, with a strong emphasis on physical game products enhanced by digital elements. Their partnership with stoetforeningen.dk indicates a strategic alliance in the fundraising sector, expanding their reach and impact. Growth indicators include a diverse product range and integration of digital gamification concepts. The company’s operations are supported by a professional website with clear branding and contact channels, facilitating customer engagement and trust.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Blackbox Branding's website is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and implements a cookie consent banner supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified, and forms appear limited with no complex data collection. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate tracking but is standard practice. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but would benefit from formalized policies, enhanced header configurations, and DNS security improvements to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and plugins to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing more comprehensive privacy documentation.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Blackbox/Bording Danmark A/S
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Blackbox Branding
Description
Specialists in production and development of scratch cards, advent calendars, lotteries for fundraising, marketing and retail games, as well as manufacturing tickets, code cards, direct mails, gift cards with effects and security printing in general.
Key services
Production of scratch cards, Advent calendars, Lotteries, Tickets and code cards, Direct mails, Gift cards with effects, Security printing, Marketing game terminals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, jQuery
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is primarily in Danish with English alternate language available
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented and visible
  4. No explicit terms of service page found
  5. Contact information is clearly presented in footer
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts present for tracking
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  10. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible content management approach. The presence of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager scripts shows integration of standard analytics and marketing tools. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and jQuery CDN, which are common practices but require monitoring for performance and security. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and uses lazy loading for images, improving performance. However, no advanced hosting provider or CDN information was detected, and performance is moderate, suggesting potential for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good due to proper meta tags and structured data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could be enhanced with performance tuning and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blackboxbranding.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blackboxbranding.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.