Skip to main content

Security report for blabhkm.com

B Lab (Hong Kong & Macau) · Non-profit · Hong Kong

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

B Lab (Hong Kong & Macau) is a non-profit organization dedicated to advancing the B Corp movement within the Hong Kong and Macau regions. The organization focuses on promoting the highest social and environmental standards to support businesses in caring for all stakeholders. The website serves as an official platform to communicate their mission and engage with businesses interested in sustainable and responsible practices. The business model is centered on advocacy and certification support rather than commercial sales, positioning B Lab as a key regional player in the non-profit sector focused on corporate responsibility. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and enhanced with the Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights. The infrastructure is hosted likely via GoDaddy, as inferred from the registrar and nameservers. The website demonstrates good SEO practices and mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in technical optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized changes. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data, which are areas for improvement. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service, which impacts privacy compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image consistent with its non-profit mission. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies is a notable compliance gap. Security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing security and privacy documentation. Strategic recommendations include improving privacy compliance, enhancing security configurations, and increasing transparency around incident response and data protection roles.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of blabhkm.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching blabhkm.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

B Lab (Hong Kong & Macau) occupies a niche market position as a regional non-profit leader in the B Corp movement, targeting businesses committed to social and environmental responsibility. Their competitive advantage lies in their official affiliation with the global B Lab network and focus on Hong Kong and Macau markets. The business model is advocacy and certification facilitation, with revenue likely from certification fees and partnerships. Target customers are businesses seeking B Corp certification or interested in sustainable business practices. Growth indicators include domain age consistent with founding date and active SEO efforts. The partnership ecosystem includes global B Lab and possibly local business networks, though no explicit partner domains were found. Operationally, the organization maintains a professional digital presence but lacks visible contact details and formal policies, which could be improved for better stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and domain registration protections, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates limited readiness for security incidents. Compliance gaps exist regarding GDPR and cookie consent, as no related policies or mechanisms were found. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in transparency and technical safeguards. Business impact of these gaps includes potential risks in user data protection and trustworthiness. Enhancing security documentation and technical controls would strengthen the posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve browser security.
  4. Establish and disclose an incident response plan and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
B Lab (Hong Kong & Macau)
Description
A non-profit driving B Corp movement to achieve the highest social and environmental standards to care for all stakeholders.
Key services
Driving B Corp movement, Promoting social and environmental standards, Supporting businesses to care for stakeholders
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO plugin, Divi Theme
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit organization promoting B Corp movement in Hong Kong and Macau.
  2. Content is professionally presented with good SEO and structured data.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin.
  6. Includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. Domain registration is stable and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with the Divi theme and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a standard but effective technical infrastructure. The use of Google Fonts and Google Analytics is typical for modern websites but introduces third-party dependencies. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests technical debt in security hardening. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, but accessibility features are basic. Modernization opportunities include enhancing security configurations, improving privacy compliance mechanisms, and optimizing performance for better user experience and trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 40/100High38 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with blabhkm.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review blabhkm.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.