Skip to main content

Security report for bixa.eu

Bixa TechnoConsulting · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bixa TechnoConsulting is a small German IT consulting company specializing in virtualization, server management, and Drupal hosting services. The website provides technical blog content and company information primarily targeting IT professionals and businesses needing specialized IT consulting. The site is built on Drupal CMS and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. While the website is functional and content-rich, it lacks critical privacy and security disclosures such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and security headers. The login form is present but lacks advanced security features like multi-factor authentication or CAPTCHA. No direct contact information or social media presence is visible, which may limit user engagement and trust. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate technical maturity but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bixa.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on IT consulting and hosting services. Its market position appears niche, catering to clients needing virtualization and Drupal expertise. The business model revolves around consulting and hosting, supported by technical blog content that establishes expertise. The absence of visible contact details and privacy policies suggests a small-scale operation with limited digital marketing efforts. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is typical for small businesses seeking to protect registrant information. The company could benefit from enhancing transparency and expanding its digital footprint to improve credibility and customer acquisition.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which help mitigate common web attacks. The login form collects username and password but does not show evidence of additional protections like CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting the ability for security researchers to report issues responsibly. Google Analytics is integrated without visible cookie consent, raising privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Introduce a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance login security by adding multi-factor authentication and CAPTCHA to prevent automated attacks.
  5. Publish clear contact information and consider adding social media links to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bixa TechnoConsulting
Description
Bixa TechnoConsulting provides IT consulting services focused on information flow guidance, virtualization, server management, and Drupal hosting and maintenance.
Key services
IT consulting, Virtualized server migration, Drupal hosting and maintenance, Remote support (fernwartung)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, PHP, Bzip2 compression (mentioned in blog content)
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure login form with password field
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in German language targeting German-speaking IT professionals.
  2. Content is primarily technical blog posts and company information.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found.
  4. Login form present but no multi-factor authentication or CAPTCHA.
  5. Google Analytics used without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No social media links or contact emails explicitly provided.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Website uses Drupal CMS with some legacy elements (e.g., IE6/7 CSS fixes).
  9. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses on main page.
  10. Company branding is consistent with logo and site title.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with legacy support for older Internet Explorer versions, indicating some technical debt. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics for functionality and tracking. The site performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site could benefit from modernization efforts including responsive design improvements, updated CMS modules, and enhanced accessibility compliance to improve user experience and search engine ranking.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bixa.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bixa.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.