Skip to main content

Security report for bixa.cc

Bixa TechnoConsulting · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bixa TechnoConsulting is a small German technology consulting company specializing in IT services such as virtualization, server migration, Drupal hosting, and Microsoft Exchange Server consulting. The website serves as a technical blog and service portal targeting IT professionals and businesses seeking specialized IT consulting. The company positions itself as a niche provider with expertise in Linux, Drupal, and Microsoft technologies. Technically, the website is built on Drupal CMS with jQuery and integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is accessible over HTTPS but lacks modern security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, indicating room for improvement in security and compliance. The content is primarily technical and professional, with no adult or questionable material detected. Overall, the website demonstrates moderate digital maturity with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. Security posture is average due to missing headers and lack of explicit incident response or security policies. The domain uses privacy protection for WHOIS data, which is common for small consultancies but limits transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, adding privacy and cookie policies, improving contact information visibility, and enhancing compliance with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bixa.cc

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector with a focus on IT consulting and hosting services. Its business model is service-based, targeting IT professionals and businesses needing specialized support in virtualization, Drupal, and Microsoft Exchange environments. The website content and blog posts indicate a strong technical orientation and knowledge sharing approach, which can help build credibility and attract a niche audience. The lack of visible contact emails or phone numbers may limit direct client engagement. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is justified given the small business nature. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The company appears to maintain a modest online presence with moderate branding consistency and trust indicators such as technical blog content and HTTPS usage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are best practices to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The login form uses POST method but no visible anti-CSRF tokens or CAPTCHA mechanisms were detected, potentially exposing it to automated attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site. Google Analytics is used without a visible cookie consent mechanism, raising privacy compliance concerns. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is average with clear areas for improvement to enhance protection and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add visible and verified company contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve trust and communication.
  4. Enhance login form security by adding CSRF protection and CAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse.
  5. Regularly update Drupal CMS and all dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bixa TechnoConsulting
Description
Bixa TechnoConsulting is a technology consulting company focused on IT services including virtualization, server management, Drupal hosting, and Microsoft Exchange Server consulting. The site features technical blog posts and offers remote support tools.
Key services
IT consulting, Virtualized server migration, Drupal hosting and maintenance, Microsoft Exchange Server consulting, Remote support (Fernwartung)
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery, Google Analytics, PHP, Bash scripting references
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure form with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in German language targeting German-speaking IT professionals
  2. Content is technical and focused on IT consulting and hosting
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found
  4. Site uses Drupal CMS with some outdated design elements
  5. Google Analytics is used without visible cookie consent mechanism
  6. No security headers detected which is a security improvement area
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed
  8. Login form present for user authentication
  9. External links mostly to reputable technical resources
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with jQuery and uses Google Analytics for tracking. The HTML is valid and the site is served over HTTPS, but lacks modern security headers and advanced SEO meta tags. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of optimization or CDN usage. Mobile optimization is basic, with no explicit responsive design meta tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present, such as skip links. The site uses standard Drupal theming and modules, indicating a traditional CMS setup without advanced modern frameworks. Technical debt is suggested by the presence of legacy IE conditional CSS and older blog posts dating back to 2007-2011. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve security headers, and enhance SEO and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bixa.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bixa.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.