Skip to main content

Security report for bitkompagniet.dk

Bitkompagniet aps · Information technology and services · Australia

Partial score · DNS & email only

10/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scanned

5 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
2of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high in the checks that completed. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bitkompagniet.dk

Only DNS and email could be checked this time. Monitoring re-checks every day and emails you when something material changes.

Daily monitoring

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

GDPR outside view
10
Average
10

Not counted

  • SSL/TLS: did not complete in this scan.
  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • Email security: did not complete in this scan.
  • DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
  • Network security: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bitkompagniet occupies a specialized niche in the Danish software development market, focusing on complex, tailored solutions for both public and private sectors. Its competitive advantage lies in deep technical expertise, user-centric design, and a collaborative approach. Revenue streams are primarily from consulting, development projects, and training services. The client portfolio includes reputable organizations such as Novo Nordisk, Moderniseringsstyrelsen, and Danske Fysioterapeuter, indicating strong market credibility. The business model is service-oriented with a lean operational structure. Partnerships with clients and subcontractors for design enhance flexibility. Growth indicators include a decade-long domain presence and ongoing projects. The company’s strategic ecosystem includes multiple public institutions and private enterprises, positioning it well for sustained demand in specialized software services.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Bitkompagniet’s website is moderate. Key strengths include the use of a webservice architecture that separates backend and frontend, and adoption of Test-Driven Development practices which improve code quality and reduce defects. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published privacy or cookie policies exposes the site to potential risks and compliance issues. The use of an outdated jQuery version may introduce vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting readiness for security events. GDPR compliance is incomplete due to missing privacy and cookie disclosures. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from formalized policies and technical enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Upgrade outdated JavaScript libraries, particularly jQuery, to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish and communicate an incident response policy with dedicated security contact channels.

Contact details published on the site

Registration number
CVR 35391061
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bitkompagniet
Description
Bitkompagniet is a software development company specializing in .NET and PHP, delivering tailored software, web, and app solutions with a focus on modern, advanced, and user-centric designs. The business offers consulting, development, project management, and training services primarily for both public and private sectors.
Key services
Custom software development, Web services and APIs, Frontend responsive design, Usability and user experience design, Automated testing and TDD, Project management and training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap (Bootswatch Flatly theme), jQuery 1.11.0, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of webservice architecture separating backend and frontend
  • Use of Test-Driven Development (TDD)
  • Secure form submission via Formspree

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (ga.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and contact form.
  4. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  5. Use of Google Analytics without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No DNSSEC enabled for domain, which is a security improvement opportunity.
  7. No visible security headers in HTML content.
  8. Website uses older jQuery version (1.11.0) which may have known vulnerabilities.
  9. No CMS detected; likely custom or static site with Bootstrap and jQuery.
  10. Multiple reputable client references and testimonials increase trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bitkompagniet.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bitkompagniet.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.