Skip to main content

Security report for biseris.lt

Biseris · Transportation · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biseris is a Lithuanian company specializing in horizontal road and parking lot marking, traffic light installation and maintenance, and related civil infrastructure solutions. The company targets municipalities, road authorities, real estate developers, airports, and commercial logistics firms, positioning itself as a regional expert in transportation infrastructure services. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Technical infrastructure includes jQuery, Bootstrap, and other standard libraries, though some outdated versions of jQuery are present, which could pose security risks. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms, but lacks explicit security headers and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, though the website content and contact information suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site scores well on business credibility and technical implementation but should improve privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biseris.lt

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Biseris operates in the transportation sector, focusing on infrastructure marking and maintenance services. Its business model is service-oriented, catering to public and private sector clients requiring road safety and infrastructure solutions. The company maintains an active online presence with clear contact channels and social media links, supporting customer engagement and marketing. The partnership with Synergy Effect for website development indicates collaboration with local digital service providers. The company appears medium-sized with a consistent brand and good content quality. However, the lack of visible certifications or detailed company registration information online limits deeper business intelligence insights. The website's multilingual support (Lithuanian and English) suggests an intent to reach broader audiences.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form, which are positive security measures. However, the presence of multiple jQuery versions may introduce vulnerabilities, and the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not found, indicating limited transparency on security governance. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which restricts domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by updating libraries, adding security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Consolidate and update jQuery to a single, secure, and current version to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Attempt to obtain and publish WHOIS and company registration information to improve domain legitimacy and business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biseris
Description
Kelių ir aikštelių ženklinimas. Taikome sprendimus civilinės infrastruktūros gerinimui,
Key services
Horizontal road and parking lot marking, Traffic light installation and maintenance, Small urban architecture, Protective road barriers, Intelligent traffic systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Knews newsletter plugin, Cycle2 jQuery plugin, Fancybox
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA in contact form
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to transportation infrastructure marking
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact form
  5. Multiple external scripts and libraries used, some outdated (jQuery versions)
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking without visible privacy disclosures
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of popular plugins and libraries including Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Bootstrap, and jQuery. The presence of two different jQuery versions loaded simultaneously suggests technical debt or misconfiguration that could lead to conflicts or security vulnerabilities. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern SEO practices such as canonical tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with standard CDN usage for Google APIs. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms, which are areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biseris.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biseris.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.