Skip to main content

Security report for biplc.co.uk

Berkeley Integra Ltd · Real Estate · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Berkeley Integra Ltd is a UK-based specialist installation contractor focusing on proprietary partitioning, dry lining, suspended ceilings, and associated interior works primarily for commercial environments. The company positions itself as a leading supplier in the UK with a strong reputation for quality workmanship and client service, supported by multiple industry accreditations. Their target audience includes main contractors, architects, and bespoke designers seeking high-quality partitioning solutions. The website reflects a professional business model centered on service delivery within the real estate and construction sectors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using WPBakery Page Builder and several modern plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Google reCAPTCHA v3, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though some accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate with no major technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, but lacks important security headers and a cookie consent mechanism, which are recommended for GDPR compliance and enhanced security posture. The absence of WHOIS data due to domain naming irregularities slightly impacts trust but does not negate the legitimacy suggested by the website content and certifications. Overall, Berkeley Integra's website presents a credible and professional business presence with room for improvement in security best practices and privacy compliance. Strategic enhancements in these areas would strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biplc.co.uk

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Berkeley Integra operates in the niche market of commercial interior partitioning and associated installation services. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive industry experience, flexible approach to design and product selection, and a portfolio of repeat clients. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering bespoke partitioning projects with high client satisfaction. Revenue streams likely derive from contracts with main contractors and direct clients in commercial construction. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem with manufacturers and professional organizations, enhancing its market position. Growth indicators include a well-maintained portfolio, visible accreditations, and a professional online presence. Strategic observations suggest the company could benefit from expanding digital marketing efforts and enhancing compliance transparency to capture broader market segments.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of Berkeley Integra's website is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is used to mitigate automated abuse on contact forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or security contact information, which limits readiness for handling security incidents. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security culture appears basic, with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure full GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Publish an incident response policy or security contact page to improve security communication and readiness.
  4. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Berkeley Integra Ltd
Registration number
03127574
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Berkeley Integra Ltd
Description
Berkeley Integra is a specialist installation contractor of proprietary partitioning, dry lining, suspended ceilings and associated works for the commercial environment.
Key services
Partitioning & Interior Walls, Associated Works (Dry Lining, Suspended Ceilings)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, jQuery, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA v3, FlexSlider, SlickNav, Lightcase, Select2
Frameworks
Bootstrap 3.3.7
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Google Fonts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to the construction partitioning industry.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain naming rules violation, which is unusual but does not necessarily indicate malicious intent.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  5. Security headers are missing, which could improve security posture.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  7. Multiple industry certifications and accreditations are displayed, enhancing trust.
  8. No social media links detected on the homepage or footer.
  9. Use of modern WordPress plugins and technologies indicates moderate technical maturity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WPBakery Page Builder, leveraging common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The front-end uses Bootstrap 3.3.7 and jQuery libraries, with additional UI components like FlexSlider and SlickNav for responsive navigation and sliders. The site loads external resources including Google Fonts and Google reCAPTCHA scripts. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt observed, but opportunities exist to optimize loading times and improve accessibility. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biplc.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biplc.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.