Skip to main content

Security report for biovakantieoord.nl

Bio Vakantieoord · Non-profit · Netherlands

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bio Vakantieoord is a specialized non-profit holiday park in the Netherlands dedicated to providing fully adapted vacation experiences for families with handicapped children. The organization offers tailored accommodations, care services, and recreational activities designed to ensure inclusivity and comfort for all guests. Their market position is unique within the Dutch hospitality sector, supported by recognized certifications such as ANBI and CBF, enhancing their credibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the website is built on the Procurios CMS platform, utilizing standard JavaScript libraries like Prototype.js and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, although some security headers could be improved. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policies are well implemented, reflecting compliance with GDPR requirements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses CSRF tokens in forms, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected, and the domain registration aligns well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence with moderate technical sophistication. The risk assessment is low, with recommendations focusing on enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biovakantieoord.nl

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bio Vakantieoord operates as a medium-sized non-profit entity focused on the hospitality sector for disabled children and their families. Their competitive advantage lies in their fully adapted facilities and comprehensive support services, which are not commonly found in the market. Revenue streams likely include donations, fundraising events, and possibly service fees. The target customer segment is families with handicapped children seeking accessible vacation options. The organization maintains partnerships, such as with Bio Manege, to expand service offerings. Growth indicators include active news updates and community engagement. Strategic observations highlight a strong brand presence, trust certifications, and a clear mission that resonates with their audience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and CSRF protection on forms. However, the absence of explicit security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found. Compliance with GDPR is evident through privacy and cookie policies. The lack of a security.txt file and limited security headers suggest room for improvement. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving HTTP header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  3. Add an incident response contact email (e.g., security@ or abuse@) to improve vulnerability reporting and response.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bio Vakantieoord
Description
Hét vakantiepark in Nederland waar gezinnen met een gehandicapt kind sámen vakantie kunnen vieren.
Key services
Fully adapted holiday park accommodations, Specialized care and support services, Activities and entertainment tailored for handicapped children, Swimming pool, adapted manege, cinema, and activity programs
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Procurios CMS, Prototype.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, iframe-resizer
Frameworks
Procurios
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • CSRF tokens present in forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on families with handicapped children and specialized holiday services.
  3. Clear privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple trust certifications (ANBI, CBF) displayed.
  5. No security policy or incident response contact found on site.
  6. Modern but somewhat basic tech stack with Procurios CMS and standard JS libraries.
  7. Good mobile and accessibility features observed.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Procurios CMS, a specialized platform supporting modular content and dynamic news features. It uses Prototype.js, iframe-resizer, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently with cache-busting query parameters. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well addressed with responsive design and skip links. SEO is supported by canonical tags, hreflang attributes for multilingual support, and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in asset delivery and security header implementation. No major technical debt or legacy technology issues were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biovakantieoord.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biovakantieoord.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.