Skip to main content

Security report for bikekitchenbrno.cz

Bike Kitchen Brno · Transportation · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bike Kitchen Brno is a small community-driven non-profit organization based in the Czech Republic focused on providing an open bicycle repair workshop and fostering social engagement around cycling culture. The website serves as a hub for community events, educational programs, and environmental initiatives. The organization benefits from EU grant support, indicating some level of external validation and funding. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, though some libraries like jQuery are outdated, posing potential security risks. The site lacks formal privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance gap especially under GDPR. Security posture is moderate with some best practices implemented but missing key headers and vulnerability disclosures. Overall, the site is functional, well-branded, and serves its community purpose effectively but would benefit from improved compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bikekitchenbrno.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the transportation and non-profit sectors, targeting local community members interested in cycling and social activities. Its business model revolves around community workshops, education, and events rather than commercial sales. The website content and social media presence support community engagement and transparency. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the organization's history, supporting legitimacy. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, likely to manage inquiries effectively. The partnership with EU programs indicates strategic funding and collaboration opportunities.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes a Content Security Policy header, which are positive security indicators. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and incident response readiness. No advanced security headers like X-Frame-Options or Referrer-Policy are detected. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML. Forms are present but no explicit anti-CSRF or input validation mechanisms are visible. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with updates and policy implementations.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and inform users about data handling.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact information.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers by adding X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Referrer-Policy headers.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of plugins, themes, and server configurations to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bike Kitchen Brno
Description
Komunitní cyklodílna otevřená pro každého. Opravujeme kola a učíme to ostatní. Zajímáme se o svět kolem sebe, společně ho tvoříme, vaříme, jíme, pijem, bavíme se. Udržujeme život a kulturu dostupnou pro každého v pomalu gentrifikované části Brna. BKB je ohnisko společenské změny. BKB je naše společná cyklodílna.
Key services
Bicycle repair and maintenance, Community education and workshops, Environmental and social events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.5.17, jQuery 1.12.4, Jetpack plugin, Visual Composer (WPBakery), Google Fonts (Source Code Pro), Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via redirect
  • Content Security Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats (Jetpack)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats (Jetpack)
Marketing tools
Jetpack
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a community non-profit focused on bicycle repair and social engagement in Brno, Czech Republic.
  2. Content is in Czech with some English pages.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes.
  5. HTTPS enforced with good SSL configuration.
  6. No phone numbers or emails explicitly found in the HTML content; contact is via contact page form.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram linked.
  8. No visible security or incident response policies.
  9. No advertising or affiliate programs detected.
  10. Minimal user tracking via Jetpack stats.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.5.17 with WPBakery Visual Composer and Jetpack plugins. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. The hosting and domain registrar is Wedos, a Czech provider, consistent with the website's locale. Performance is moderate with some optimization possible. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforces secure connections via redirect and Content Security Policy. However, the outdated jQuery version and lack of advanced security headers present technical risks. The site does not use aggressive tracking or advertising, maintaining user privacy at a basic level.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bikekitchenbrno.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bikekitchenbrno.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.