Skip to main content

Security report for bikeep.com

Bikeep · Transportation · Estonia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bikeep is a medium-sized Estonian company founded in 2012, specializing in smart micromobility infrastructure including commercial bike racks, smart bike lockers, and e-scooter stations. The company targets municipalities, transit companies, commercial and residential properties, positioning itself as a global leader in smart bike parking and charging solutions. The website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, optimized for performance and mobile use. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers. Privacy compliance is partial with cookie consent but no explicit privacy policy found. Business credibility is high with clear company information, testimonials, and references. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bikeep.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bikeep operates in the transportation and technology sectors, offering IoT-enabled micromobility solutions. Its business model focuses on B2B and B2G markets, providing tailored infrastructure to cities and companies. The company leverages partnerships with municipalities and commercial real estate to expand its footprint. The presence of multiple video testimonials and case studies indicates active marketing and customer engagement. The company uses advanced digital marketing and analytics tools to track user engagement and optimize outreach. The domain age and WHOIS data support a stable and legitimate business presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited status on the domain to prevent unauthorized transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and common security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are missing, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface, necessitating regular audits. No public incident response or security policies are published, which may impact transparency. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bikeep
Description
Manufacturer of high quality commercial bike racks & bike parking systems. Also provides e-scooter stations, bike shelters, bike sheds & bicycle lockers. Leading smart commercial scooter and bike parking and charging provider globally.
Key services
Smart bike parking stations, Smart bike lockers, Smart scooter stations, Dock-based e-scooter parking and charging, Console dashboard, Smart IoT platform, Bike house smart access
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WPBakery Page Builder, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookie Law Info plugin, WP Rocket caching, Funnelytics tracking
Frameworks
PHP (WordPress), jQuery
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status to prevent unauthorized transfers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Funnelytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Funnelytics
Marketing tools
Funnelytics, CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content rich
  2. No privacy policy page found explicitly in HTML content
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  4. Contact information includes company email sales@bikeep.com and contact form
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy
  8. Domain WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well aged
  9. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO Premium for content management and SEO optimization. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Funnelytics for analytics and user behavior tracking. WP Rocket is used for caching and performance optimization. The site is mobile optimized and loads quickly. DNS is managed via ns.elkdata.ee name servers, likely Estonian hosting. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, but some security best practices like DNSSEC and security headers are missing, representing opportunities for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bikeep.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bikeep.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.