Skip to main content

Security report for bike-sfl.at

Bikepark Serfaus-Fiss-Ladis · Transportation · Austria

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bikepark Serfaus-Fiss-Ladis operates as an official mountain biking destination in Austria, offering bikepark access, biking schools, and trail information to outdoor enthusiasts and tourists. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact details and social media presence, targeting a broad audience interested in biking and outdoor recreation. Technically, the site uses Bootstrap 3 and Google Tag Manager, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with room for modernization and enhanced security. Security posture is moderate due to lack of visible security headers and absence of explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Overall, the site is safe, accessible, and trustworthy but would benefit from improved privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bike-sfl.at

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bike-sfl.at, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bike-sfl.at right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business is positioned as a regional tourism and recreation provider specializing in mountain biking in the Serfaus-Fiss-Ladis area. Its competitive advantage lies in being the official bikepark with comprehensive services including biking schools and trail information. The business model focuses on attracting tourists and biking enthusiasts, leveraging digital channels such as social media for engagement. The company appears medium-sized with a clear focus on transportation and hospitality sectors. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms but no direct business partners were detected from the data. Growth indicators are positive given the professional web presence and active social media channels.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers detected in the provided data. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies, which limits the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified, but the lack of security best practices such as CSP or HSTS headers is a concern. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, which requires proper configuration to ensure privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Conduct a security audit of all forms and input fields to ensure secure data handling and prevent injection vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Bikepark Serfaus-Fiss-Ladis
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bikepark Serfaus-Fiss-Ladis
Description
Ready to experience the biking paradise Serfaus-Fiss-Ladis? Find all information regarding opening times, biking school, trails & much more at one glance!
Key services
Bikepark access, Biking school, Trail information, Bike rental and related services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.4, Google Tag Manager, JSON-LD structured data, FontFace web fonts (Roboto, Oswald)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in structured data with email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Social media presence is established with official Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  5. Technical implementation uses Bootstrap 3 and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL status unknown.
  7. No forms or form fields were explicitly found in the truncated HTML content.
  8. Content is relevant and professional, targeting biking tourists and outdoor enthusiasts.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 3.3.4, a stable but older front-end framework, and employs Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The use of JSON-LD structured data improves SEO and semantic understanding by search engines. Web fonts such as Roboto and Oswald are embedded via base64-encoded font-face declarations, which may impact initial load performance. The site appears mobile responsive with a viewport meta tag and responsive CSS classes. However, no CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in modernizing the tech stack and optimizing font loading. No broken elements or errors were observed in the provided content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from updates to newer frameworks and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bike-sfl.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bike-sfl.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.