Skip to main content

Security report for bigbox.lv

Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bigbox.lv is an e-commerce retailer specializing in household and electronics products, targeting consumers primarily in Latvia. The website presents a professional and modern interface built on Next.js and React, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The business model focuses on online retail with a clear emphasis on affordability and product variety. The site uses reputable third-party services for cookie consent management and analytics, demonstrating awareness of privacy and user experience considerations. However, the absence of visible privacy policy and contact information pages limits transparency and user trust. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers properly configured, but the lack of explicit security and incident response policies is a gap. Overall, the site appears legitimate and professionally managed, but improvements in compliance documentation and contact transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bigbox.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector with a focus on household and electronic goods, serving a regional market in Latvia. Its competitive advantage lies in offering products at lower prices through an online platform. The use of advanced web technologies and integration with multiple marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement. The absence of detailed company registration or WHOIS data limits deeper insights into corporate structure or ownership. The partnership with domains like komputronik.pl and tellq.io indicates collaboration with logistics or payment service providers. Growth potential is supported by a solid digital presence but could be enhanced by clearer business and compliance disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, modern security headers, and use of CSRF tokens in cookies. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive, categorizing cookies by purpose and providing user control, aligning with GDPR principles. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure channels reduces the site's security maturity. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The presence of multiple third-party scripts requires ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Enhancing transparency around security practices and providing dedicated security contact points would strengthen the overall posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add visible and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  3. Implement and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize security risks from external sources.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Online retailer offering household and electronics products at lower prices.
Key services
Online sales of household goods, Electronics retail
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Sentry
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Use of CSRF tokens in cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Flixfacts, Flixmedia
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TikTok, Hotjar
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, TikTok, Google Analytics (implied)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform focused on household and electronics products in Latvia.
  2. Uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React.
  3. Implements cookie consent via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories and descriptions.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly detected in the content.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  8. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools are used, with moderate user tracking.
  9. No signs of adult or NSFW content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging server-side rendering and modern JavaScript frameworks for performance and SEO benefits. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, respectively. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and assets from a dedicated media API domain. Performance is moderate with preloading of fonts and images, and mobile optimization is good. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is modern and aligns with current best practices, though opportunities exist for enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bigbox.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bigbox.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.