Skip to main content

Security report for biedribatev.lv

Biedrība TEV · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Biedrība TEV is a Latvian charitable non-profit organization dedicated to providing humanitarian aid to Ukraine, including support for civilians, military personnel, medics, and refugees in Latvia. The organization operates donation campaigns and projects focused on relief efforts and rehabilitation. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, targeting donors and supporters interested in Ukraine humanitarian aid. Technically, the site uses a Mozello CMS platform with jQuery and various plugins, hosted on Amazon Cloudfront CDN, offering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS likely enabled, cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible advanced security headers or incident response information. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate and consistent with the business profile. Overall, the website is trustworthy and functional, serving its non-profit mission effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching biedribatev.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization occupies a niche non-profit sector focused on Ukraine humanitarian aid, leveraging public benefit status to attract donations with tax benefits. Its business model relies on donations and community support. The website's multilingual approach broadens its reach to Latvian, English, and Ukrainian speakers. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports community engagement. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage suggests communication is managed via social media or dedicated pages. The organization appears small but focused, with no evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies. The website content and structure indicate a stable, mission-driven operation with moderate digital maturity.

Security posture

The website demonstrates basic security awareness with HTTPS and a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR compliance. However, no advanced security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) or security policies are present. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and readiness. No forms or inputs on the homepage reduce attack surface but also limit direct user engagement. The absence of exposed sensitive data is positive. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhancements in headers, policies, and contact channels for security incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  3. Add clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities, including outdated libraries or plugins.
  5. Enhance SEO and accessibility features to improve website reach and compliance with best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Biedrība TEV
Description
Biedrība TEV is a charitable organization focused on providing humanitarian aid to Ukraine, including support for civilians, military personnel, medics, and Ukrainian refugees in Latvia. It holds a public benefit organization status allowing donors to receive tax benefits.
Key services
Humanitarian aid projects for Ukraine, Support for Ukrainian refugees in Latvia, Fundraising and donation campaigns
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay jQuery plugin, ResponsiveVideos jQuery plugin
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian non-profit charity focused on humanitarian aid to Ukraine.
  2. Content is well-structured with clear navigation and multilingual support (Latvian, English, Ukrainian).
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or footer.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram with official links.
  5. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR awareness.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage or main content for direct contact or donations (likely handled on separate pages).
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  10. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 2.2.4 and several jQuery plugins for gallery and UI effects. It is hosted on Amazon Cloudfront CDN, which supports good content delivery performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes a cookie consent mechanism. However, there is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or advanced SEO structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. The HTML is valid and well-structured, but accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and SEO metadata completeness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with biedribatev.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review biedribatev.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.