Skip to main content

Security report for bicz.cz

BICZ a.s. · Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BICZ a.s. is a Czech Republic based real estate investment company specializing in residential housing projects, property reconstruction, and rental services. The company positions itself as a leading specialist in its sector, targeting investors and clients interested in responsible real estate investment. The website reflects a professional business model focused on property development and management within the Czech market. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Cookiebot for GDPR compliance. The site is mobile optimized and presents good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service documentation. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy verification, though the website content and technical setup appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or questionable content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: uvyuop3sahnfm34warje74jmutw33n3kyc6kom77d7c5tpvgrtwq.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bicz.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector with a focus on residential projects and property rental, targeting investors seeking responsible investment opportunities. The business model relies on project development, reconstruction, and subsequent rental income. The website content and structured data indicate a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and good content quality. The use of Google Ads and Facebook retargeting suggests active marketing efforts. However, the lack of visible contact details and privacy policy pages may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The domain's WHOIS data absence suggests a need for further verification of registration legitimacy. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism with granular user controls, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Leady tracking, which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were found in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers, documented incident response contacts, and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve web security.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Provide clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BICZ a.s.
Description
Investujte zodpovědně do nemovitostí s BICZ holding. Jsme předním specialistou na projekty rezidenčního bydlení, rekonstrukce a následný pronájem.
Key services
residential housing projects, property reconstruction, property rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.9.12, jQuery 3.6.0, Slider Revolution 6.5.14, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Leady
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Leady
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with granular controls, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the scanned content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content.
  6. Website uses modern technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.9.12 with jQuery and Slider Revolution plugins, indicating a standard CMS-based infrastructure. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are used for tracking and marketing analytics. Cookiebot manages cookie consent, supporting GDPR compliance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bicz.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bicz.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.