Skip to main content

Security report for bfinvest.hu

BF Invest Ingatlanhasznosító Kft. · Real Estate · Hungary

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BF Invest Ingatlanhasznosító Kft. is a Hungarian real estate company specializing in harbor development and management, particularly the Balatonfüredi Hajógyári kikötő. The company has a long-standing presence since 2005 and offers services including boat storage, boat lifting, and harbor facilities with conference and business rooms. Their market position is that of a local, established player in the real estate and harbor services sector, targeting boating enthusiasts and local businesses. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with older JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.7, bxSlider, and Fancybox 1.3.4. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking tools are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers and uses outdated libraries that may expose it to vulnerabilities. There are no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to reduce risks and enhance trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bfinvest.hu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BF Invest operates in the real estate sector with a niche focus on harbor development and management. Their competitive advantage lies in their established presence and specialized services at the Balatonfüredi harbor. The business model revolves around real estate development, harbor berth rental, and associated services such as boat storage and maintenance. Revenue streams likely include berth rentals, service fees, and event hosting. The target customers are local boat owners, sailing enthusiasts, and businesses requiring harbor facilities. Growth indicators include expansion projects supported by government funding (Új Széchényi Terv). The company maintains a straightforward partnership ecosystem with no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. Strategic observations suggest a stable local market position but a need for digital and security modernization.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with notable gaps. HTTPS is implemented, which is essential, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.7 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The lack of analytics and tracking reduces privacy risks but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity level is basic, with recommendations to update libraries, implement security headers, and establish privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS).
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Add a cookie consent mechanism to obtain user consent for any tracking or cookies used.
  5. Establish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
BF Invest Ingatlanhasznosító Kft.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BF Invest Ingatlanhasznosító Kft.
Description
BF Invest Ingatlanhasznosító Kft. is a company engaged in real estate development and management, specifically focused on the Balatonfüredi Hajógyári kikötő (Balatonfüred Shipyard Harbor) project. They expanded the harbor capacity from 116 to over 290 berths, including building a new sailing center with conference rooms, business rooms, sailing school, sailing shop, bike rental, and children's play area. The harbor offers high-quality services and European-level environment with a notable restaurant.
Key services
Harbor development, Boat storage and rental, Boat lifting and servicing, Event and conference facilities
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.7, bxSlider, Fancybox 1.3.4, WordPress 6.8.3, Google Fonts (Roboto Condensed, Exo 2)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented in the footer with company domain email and phone numbers.
  4. Website uses outdated JavaScript libraries which pose security risks.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented.
  6. Content is relevant, professional, and focused on real estate and harbor services.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. No social media links found on the site.
  9. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in the HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, leveraging older JavaScript libraries including jQuery 1.7, bxSlider, and Fancybox 1.3.4. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site has moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. No modern frameworks or progressive web app features are detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS but does not implement advanced security headers. There is no evidence of analytics or marketing tools. The technical debt is moderate due to outdated libraries and missing security best practices, presenting modernization opportunities to improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bfinvest.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bfinvest.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.