Skip to main content

Security report for bestvisio.cz

Real Estate · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BESTVISIO.cz is a Czech Republic based small business specializing in providing innovative digital tools for customers to select and visualize paving and fencing products. Their offerings include online configurators for paving and fences and a virtual reality application that allows users to preview fencing options in real environments using mobile devices. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and consistent branding, targeting homeowners and customers interested in outdoor home improvement products. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including lazy loading images, responsive CSS, and integrates Google Analytics and CookieHub for tracking and cookie consent management. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent and Google reCaptcha usage but lacks visible security headers and published privacy policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection, which slightly reduces transparency but is not uncommon for small businesses. Overall, the site is safe, user-friendly, and provides useful tools for its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bestvisio.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector focusing on product visualization and configuration tools for paving and fencing. Their business model is B2C, providing online applications to facilitate product selection and ordering. The market position appears niche and localized to the Czech Republic. Key services include paving configurators, fence configurators, and a VR app for fence visualization. The website integrates tracking and marketing tools but lacks comprehensive legal and security disclosures. Contact information is clearly provided, supporting customer engagement. The absence of WHOIS data limits external verification but the site content and external links to best.cz suggest legitimate business operations. Growth potential lies in expanding digital tools and enhancing compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. It employs HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics and CookieHub scripts), cookie consent with opt-in/out, and Google reCaptcha cookies indicating bot protection. However, no HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) were detected in the provided data, and no privacy policy or terms of service pages are published, which are compliance gaps under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site does not expose sensitive data or show signs of vulnerabilities in the analyzed content. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and terms policies, adding security.txt, and improving accessibility and compliance documentation to strengthen security posture and regulatory adherence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting and incident response.
  4. Conduct an accessibility audit and improve compliance to ensure the website is usable by all users including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly review and update SSL/TLS configurations to maintain strong encryption and protect user data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
BESTVISIO offers unique applications to help customers select paving and fencing products, including online configurators and virtual reality tools for visualization.
Key services
Paving configurator, Fence configurator, Virtual reality application for fence visualization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CookieHub cookie consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of Google reCaptcha (implied by cookies)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed cookie categories and opt-in/out options.
  4. Contact information includes a Czech phone number and company email address.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found on the site.
  6. Website uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  8. Content is focused on product configurators and virtual reality applications for paving and fencing.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  10. Technical implementation uses modern CSS and JavaScript with lazy loading and responsive design.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, including jQuery and lazy loading for images to optimize performance. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user behavior and CookieHub for cookie consent management. The site is responsive and mobile-optimized with multiple CSS stylesheets for layout, typography, and UI components. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization but basic SEO and accessibility features. No server-side or backend technologies were identified from the provided data. Technical risks include lack of visible security headers and incomplete compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bestvisio.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bestvisio.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.