Skip to main content

Security report for bert.fr

Bert Transport · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bert Transport is a well-established French logistics and transport company with over 50 years of experience, offering tailored and innovative solutions primarily to business clients. The company emphasizes creativity, adaptability, and expertise to meet client needs in transport on demand, customized solutions, and logistics. The website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress, leveraging modern plugins such as Gravity Forms and Google reCAPTCHA to secure user interactions. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, with multilingual support and structured data enhancing search visibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and CAPTCHA on forms, though some HTTP security headers are missing and no explicit security policy or incident response details are published. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trust. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and business-focused digital front.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bert.fr

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and logistics sector, targeting B2B clients requiring customized and on-demand transport solutions. Its market position is supported by a long operational history and a broad service portfolio. The business model focuses on providing innovative, client-centric logistics services with a strong emphasis on sustainability and energy transition, as indicated by news about electric tractors and alternative fuels. The company maintains active engagement through social media and regularly updates its news section, indicating a dynamic and growth-oriented approach. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, suggesting an independent operation. The website's content and structure support lead generation and client engagement through contact forms and career opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA protecting form submissions. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No direct contact information for security incidents or vulnerability disclosures is provided, which could hinder incident response effectiveness. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries visibly, but continuous monitoring and plugin updates are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed, but publishing a dedicated security policy and incident response contacts would enhance trust and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bert Transport
Description
Solutions logistiques et transports sur mesure et innovantes, accompagnant les clients depuis plus de 50 ans avec réactivité, adaptabilité, stabilité et expertise.
Key services
Transport à la demande, Solutions sur-mesure, Logistique
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Flickity slider, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Gravity Forms
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in French with English alternate.
  3. Uses modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. Includes GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  5. Contact is primarily via a secure form with CAPTCHA; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  6. Social media presence is active on major platforms.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and business continuity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, utilizing Gravity Forms for data collection and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. It uses modern web fonts with performance optimizations and a responsive design suitable for mobile devices. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting is provided by OVH, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. The site uses Flickity for sliders and jQuery for scripting. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but security header implementation and accessibility improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bert.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bert.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.