Skip to main content

Security report for berguskati.lv

Berģu Skati · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Berģu Skati is a Latvian real estate business specializing in the sale of residential land plots near Mašēnu lake. The website targets individuals or families interested in building private homes in scenic lakeside communities close to the city. The business model focuses on real estate development and land sales, positioning itself as a local provider of unique lakeside residential opportunities. The website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity with good SEO and mobile optimization. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, but lack advanced security headers and formal privacy policies, which could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits full trust verification, but the site appears professional and legitimate based on content and technical setup. Overall, the site serves its business purpose well but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching berguskati.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the real estate sector in Latvia, focusing on niche lakeside residential land sales. Its competitive advantage lies in offering plots in unique natural surroundings with full communications near urban areas. The business model is direct sales of land plots, targeting local buyers seeking private home construction. The website content is professionally presented with consistent branding and good SEO, supporting market visibility. However, the lack of explicit contact information and privacy policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. Growth potential exists in expanding digital presence and improving compliance to attract a broader audience.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security practices. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The absence of a privacy policy and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in compliance and incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, formal privacy documentation, and security incident contact channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy page to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include clear contact information such as company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins and conduct security audits to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Berģu Skati
Description
Ciemats Berģu Skati atrodas Mašēnu ezera krastā. Trīs dažādi privātmāju ciemi pilsētas tuvumā ar visām komunikācijām, unikālas dabas ietverti.
Key services
Sale of land plots for private house construction, Development of residential communities near Mašēnu lake
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Jet Menu, Google reCAPTCHA
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieYes
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Elementor and Yoast SEO.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local real estate buyers.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented via CookieYes.
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the scanned content.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. No social media links explicitly found in the scanned HTML.
  9. Site uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection.
  10. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. External libraries include Flickity for carousels and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The site loads CSS and JS assets from reputable CDNs. Performance appears moderate with some large background images used for visual appeal. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and font-face custom fonts. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and semantic HTML improvements. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Overall, the technical stack is solid but could benefit from performance optimization and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with berguskati.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review berguskati.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.