Skip to main content

Security report for bergara.online

Rifles Bergara International · Retail · Spain

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bergara.online is the official website for Rifles Bergara International, a company specializing in the manufacture and sale of rifles and related accessories. The site serves as an e-commerce platform and information hub, offering product catalogs, blogs, events, and an international network of authorized dealers. The business targets shooting sports enthusiasts and hunters, positioning itself as a reputable international brand in the firearms retail sector. The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including popular plugins and analytics tools, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and age verification in place, but lacks comprehensive privacy policies and explicit security headers. The site uses extensive third-party marketing and analytics services, indicating a focus on customer engagement and data-driven marketing. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency are recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bergara.online

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focused on firearms and accessories, leveraging an international dealer network to expand market reach. The business model combines direct online sales with dealer partnerships, supported by digital marketing and content strategies. The website's multilingual support and catalog offerings suggest a medium-sized enterprise with a global audience. The presence of advanced analytics and marketing tools like Klaviyo and VWO indicates a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. However, the absence of clear privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears well-established with consistent WHOIS data and branding, but should enhance transparency and compliance to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes an age verification mechanism, which is important given the nature of the products. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are present, increasing the attack surface and necessitating vigilant security management. The lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but the absence of a detailed privacy policy reduces GDPR compliance confidence. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by adopting best practices in headers, policies, and incident management.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive and accessible privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response and abuse contact information to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rifles Bergara International
Description
Official Website of BERGARA RIFLES and accessories Online Shop, Blog, 2022 Catalog, Events and a international network of authorized dealers.
Key services
Rifles sales, Accessories sales, Catalog distribution, Event information, Dealer network
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.0.1, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Klaviyo, AddToAny, Visual Website Optimizer (VWO), jQuery 3.6.0
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Age verification mechanism implemented
  • Use of reCAPTCHA script
  • Cookie consent mechanism present

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer, Klaviyo
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Visual Website Optimizer, Klaviyo
Marketing tools
Klaviyo, AddToAny
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a commercial platform for Bergara rifles and accessories
  2. Content is professionally presented with multilingual support
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. Cookie consent and age verification mechanisms are implemented
  5. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using version 6.0.1, enhanced with popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, and Slider Revolution. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar, Klaviyo, and Visual Website Optimizer, indicating a sophisticated marketing infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with caching and optimization plugins in use. However, the site lacks some advanced accessibility features and explicit security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bergara.online. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bergara.online.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.