Skip to main content

Security report for bennetts.com

Bennetts · Retail · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Bennetts is a UK-based family-run business specializing in automotive parts and tools, established in 1954. The company positions itself as a leading specialist covering all car makes and models, serving primarily car owners and automotive professionals. The website provides basic information about the business, store locator functionality, and links to privacy and terms policies. Technically, the site runs on an older version of WordPress (4.9.12) with jQuery 1.12.4, indicating potential security risks due to outdated software. HTTPS is enforced, but no advanced security headers are detected. Privacy compliance is addressed with visible cookie consent mechanisms and policy pages. However, no contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided on the homepage, limiting direct communication channels. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy despite the website's active presence and business claims. Overall, the site is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bennetts.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bennetts.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bennetts.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate bennetts.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
34
Registered
34
Resolving
34
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-19

Masked preview

  • be•••••••.comMediumaddition
  • be•••••••.comMediumaddition
  • be••••••.comMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of bennetts.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Bennetts operates in the retail and transportation sectors, focusing on automotive parts and tools sales. The business model is retail-centric with physical stores supported by an online presence. The company leverages its long-standing history and family-run status as trust signals. Market positioning is that of a specialist with a broad product range for all car makes and models. The target audience includes UK car owners and automotive professionals. The website lacks detailed business contact information and certifications, which could improve credibility. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The company appears to maintain a moderate brand consistency but could improve content quality and navigation clarity to enhance user experience.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the site's defense-in-depth posture. No visible incident response or security policy pages are present, and no security contact channels are provided. The cookie consent mechanism indicates some level of privacy compliance, but overall security maturity is moderate. Recommendations include updating software components, implementing security headers, and establishing clear security policies and incident response contacts to improve resilience and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Update WordPress and all plugins/themes to the latest supported versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  4. Enhance website content with clear company contact details including verified emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability scans to maintain a strong security posture and compliance with data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bennetts
Description
UK leading car parts and tools specialist, covering all car makes and models. Family run business established in 1954.
Key services
Car parts sales, Tools sales, Store locator service
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.12, jQuery 1.12.4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced via script redirect

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking
  2. Content is minimal but relevant to automotive parts retail
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found on homepage
  4. Privacy and cookie policies present with consent mechanism
  5. Outdated WordPress and jQuery versions pose security risks
  6. No visible security headers detected
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook link
  9. No forms detected on homepage
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in HTML
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.12 with jQuery 1.12.4, which are outdated and may expose the site to security risks. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and includes basic CSS for styling. HTTPS is enforced via a JavaScript redirect, ensuring encrypted communication. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features, with minimal structured data or Open Graph tags. Performance is moderate with no evident optimization for mobile beyond basic responsive CSS. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical debt is moderate due to outdated software and lack of modern security practices. Modernization opportunities include upgrading the CMS, improving SEO and accessibility, and implementing security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bennetts.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bennetts.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.