Skip to main content

Security report for bemore.lv

BeMore.lv · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BeMore.lv is a small Latvian retail and service business specializing in waxing services and related retail products such as RICA waxes. Established since 2011, it serves customers primarily in Riga and Jēkabpils. The website presents basic but consistent branding and contact information, including phone, email, and physical address, alongside social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The business model focuses on direct service provision and e-commerce retail of waxing products. Technically, the website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery, Owl Carousel, and Google Analytics, but some libraries are outdated, which may pose security risks. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO but lacks advanced accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bemore.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable local market position as a waxing service provider with a niche retail e-shop. Its competitive advantage lies in professional waxing services established since 2011 and use of quality original products. Revenue streams likely include service appointments and product sales. The target audience is general consumers seeking waxing services in Latvia. The partnership ecosystem is limited to social media channels and no visible third-party business partners. Growth indicators are modest with a focus on local markets. The website lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures, which could impact customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied but no visible security headers or advanced protections. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.9.1 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent. The site collects user emails via a newsletter subscription form but lacks explicit privacy notices. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small retail business but requiring improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Update JavaScript libraries to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search rankings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BeMore.lv
Description
Vaksācija ir populārākā un iecienītākā metode, lai atbrīvotos no liekā apmatojuma. Vaksācija Rīgā pie profesionālas meistares pieejama kopš 2011.gada. Vaksācija Jēkabpilī kopš 2016. gada. Profesionālas vaksācijas rezultātā āda ir gluda, skaista un kopta, pēc kuras matiņi ataug plānāki un retāki.
Key services
Vaksācija pakalpojumi (waxing services), RICA vaski (wax products), Vaksācijas e-veikals (waxing e-shop)
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery UI 1.10.4, Owl Carousel, Magnific Popup, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome, Modernizr
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Analytics and external scripts loaded over HTTPS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. Content is focused on waxing services and related retail products.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected.
  10. Website uses older versions of jQuery which may pose security risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional front-end stack with jQuery, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, and Magnific Popup for UI components and effects. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for visitor tracking. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and icons from FontAwesome. The HTML structure is valid but uses older libraries which may affect security and performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bemore.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bemore.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.