Skip to main content

Security report for belivisitorcentre.eu

Beli Visitor Centre · Non-profit · Croatia

High risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 3 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Beli Visitor Centre is a specialized non-profit organization focused on the conservation and rehabilitation of griffon vultures in Cres, Croatia. The center provides educational exhibits, workshops, volunteer programs, and operates a rehabilitation facility for these birds. It serves both local visitors and international nature enthusiasts, positioning itself as a key regional conservation hub. The website is professionally designed using WordPress, with good mobile optimization and accessibility features, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA, though some improvements in security headers and privacy compliance are recommended. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-aligned with its mission, with clear contact information and partner affiliations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching belivisitorcentre.eu

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention belivisitorcentre.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for belivisitorcentre.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The center operates in the non-profit sector with a focus on environmental conservation and education. Its partnerships with regional government bodies, NGOs, and academic institutions strengthen its credibility and outreach. The business model relies on visitor engagement, educational programming, and volunteer involvement. The website content and structure support these goals effectively, with regular news updates and multimedia content. The organization appears stable and well-established since 2018, with a clear target audience of visitors and conservation supporters.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and integration of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Accessibility tools enhance user experience for diverse audiences. However, the absence of security headers and explicit security or incident response policies indicates room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but could be enhanced with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply fully with GDPR and enhance privacy transparency.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and WordPress core to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by documenting data retention policies and user data handling practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Beli Visitor Centre
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Beli Visitor Centre
Description
Centar za posjetitelje i oporavilište za bjeloglave supove Beli, Cres. The center offers multimedia exhibitions, educational workshops, volunteer programs, and information about the conservation and rehabilitation of griffon vultures.
Key services
Visitor exhibitions, Educational workshops, Volunteer programs, Wildlife rehabilitation and monitoring
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Justified Image Grid plugin, Ultimate VC Addons, Cornerstone, Pojo Accessibility plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • Accessibility toolbar for users

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-maintained WordPress site focused on griffon vulture conservation and visitor education.
  2. Content is in Croatian with English alternate language available.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, physical address, and contact persons.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  5. No privacy or cookie policy banner detected, though privacy policy page exists.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. Site uses Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics and form security.
  8. Accessibility tools are implemented via Pojo Accessibility plugin.
  9. No critical security issues or vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
  10. No advertising networks detected beyond Google Tag Manager.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and various plugins for accessibility and image galleries. The site uses deferred loading for scripts and optimized CSS for performance. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features are well implemented. Hosting details are limited but the domain registrar is Key-Systems GmbH, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management. The technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for modernization in security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with belivisitorcentre.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review belivisitorcentre.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.