Skip to main content

Security report for en.belavia.by

ОАО «Авиакомпания «Белавиа» · Transportation · Belarus

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Belavia is the national airline of the Republic of Belarus, providing passenger and cargo air transportation services. The company operates a comprehensive website offering online ticket booking, flight status checks, online check-in, baggage services, cargo shipment, and loyalty programs. The website targets a broad audience including individual travelers and corporate clients, positioning itself as a key player in Belarusian and regional air transport markets. The business is well-established with a domain age consistent with its founding date and maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and comprehensive service offerings. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience across devices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, supporting Belavia's market credibility and customer engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching en.belavia.by

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
45
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Belavia operates in the transportation sector as a large airline company with a long history since 1996. Its business model focuses on passenger air travel, cargo services, and ancillary offerings such as transfers and hotel bookings. The company leverages partnerships for loyalty programs and hotel services, enhancing customer retention and cross-selling opportunities. The website's content and structure reflect a mature digital strategy with clear navigation, multilingual support, and integration of analytics for marketing insights. The presence of official certifications and contact information reinforces trust. The airline's market position as the national carrier provides competitive advantages, including regulatory support and brand recognition. Growth indicators include new route announcements and service expansions visible in news sections. The partnership ecosystem includes loyalty program platforms and hotel booking services, indicating strategic diversification.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, reflecting compliance with privacy laws such as GDPR. Input validation is present on forms, reducing injection risks. However, the absence of visible security headers like Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options suggests potential areas for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies indicates a gap in transparency and readiness communication. Overall, the security posture is solid for a commercial airline website but would benefit from adopting advanced security headers, publishing incident response details, and continuous vulnerability management to mitigate emerging threats and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards, improving usability for users with disabilities.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and communicate data retention policies and privacy practices clearly to strengthen GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ОАО «Авиакомпания «Белавиа»
Registration number
600390798
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ОАО «Авиакомпания «Белавиа»
Description
Авиакомпания БЕЛАВИА предлагает купить билеты на самолет по различным направлениям. Дешевые авиабилеты у нас! ☎+375 17 220-25-55
Key services
Passenger air ticket sales, Online flight booking, Flight check-in, Baggage services, Cargo transportation, Loyalty program (Белавиа Лидер), Transfer services, Hotel booking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Yandex Metrika, Google Tag Manager (commented out), Cookies.js, Modernizr, Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS implied by domain
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Input validation on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Yandex Metrika, Google Analytics (commented out)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Google Tag Manager (commented out)
Marketing tools
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple interactive forms.
  2. Strong presence of official contact information and social media links.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented, indicating compliance awareness.
  4. No signs of blocking, WAF challenges, or minimal content.
  5. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools for analytics.
  6. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS usage is implied.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response info publicly available.
  8. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with jQuery, jQuery UI, and Slick Carousel for UI components and interactivity. Analytics are primarily handled via Yandex Metrika with Google Tag Manager scripts present but commented out. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and multilingual support. Hosting is managed through Belarus-based providers with a domain registered since 2002, indicating stable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and cookie management. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility could modernize the platform further. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports business operations effectively with opportunities for security and accessibility enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with en.belavia.by. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review en.belavia.by.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.