Skip to main content

Security report for bekereja.lv

Mārtiņa Beķereja · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Mārtiņa Beķereja is a traditional Latvian bakery and café business offering a wide range of bakery products including cakes, pastries, and bread. The website positions itself as the oldest bakery in Latvia, emphasizing natural products and longstanding traditions. The business targets general consumers interested in fresh bakery goods and café services. The website is built on WordPress with multilingual support, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. It uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Leaflet.js for maps, and WP Rocket for performance optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and basic security best practices observed, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms, reflecting basic GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, supporting the business's retail and hospitality operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bekereja.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and hospitality sectors, focusing on bakery and café services. It leverages a WordPress platform with multilingual capabilities to reach a broader audience. The business model centers on direct product sales and custom cake orders, supported by physical café locations. The presence of social media links and structured data enhances its market presence and trustworthiness. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a strong local market position based on tradition and product quality. The website content and product listings suggest a focus on quality and customer experience.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google Tag Manager and Analytics with consent management, indicating awareness of privacy and security. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, which is common for small retail businesses but could be enhanced for better security posture. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy and other security headers to mitigate XSS and clickjacking risks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Consider adding a dedicated data protection officer contact or privacy contact to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mārtiņa Beķereja
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mārtiņa Beķereja
Description
Senākā Latvijas konditoreja Mārtiņa Beķereja - Dabīgi produkti, labākie konditori, laipnākie pārdevēji, Latvijas konditorejas senās tradīcijas.
Key services
Bakery products (cakes, pastries, bread), Café services, Custom cake orders
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Leaflet.js, WP Rocket, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based bakery and café site with multilingual support.
  2. Content is rich with product listings, prices, and images.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present with consent mechanisms.
  4. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet for direct user data collection.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies found on the site.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with common plugins for multilingual support (WPML), caching and performance (WP Rocket), and analytics (Google Tag Manager and Analytics). The tech stack includes jQuery and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML content. The site could benefit from enhanced security headers and improved accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bekereja.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bekereja.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.