Beisheim Stiftung is a non-profit foundation operating primarily in Germany and Switzerland, providing funding and support for various projects. The website serves as an informational portal offering downloadable resources such as funding criteria and application guidelines. The foundation targets applicants and partners interested in its funding programs. Technically, the website is built using the Nuxt.js framework and integrates Cookiebot for cookie consent management, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. The site employs HTTPS and uses Piwik Analytics for visitor statistics, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit security policies. The absence of WHOIS data and contact information slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve transparency and security documentation.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
High
Weak SSL Key Length
SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
75
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
84
After the cap
75
Not counted
Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention beisheim-stiftung.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for beisheim-stiftung.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The foundation occupies a niche position in the non-profit sector, focusing on regional funding activities in Germany and Switzerland. Its business model revolves around grant-making and information dissemination. The website supports this by providing clear funding criteria and downloadable documents for applicants. The lack of direct contact details and social media presence suggests a controlled communication approach, possibly to manage inquiries efficiently. The use of a custom CMS and modern JavaScript framework indicates investment in digital infrastructure. The foundation's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed on the site. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not publicly disclosed, consistent with typical non-profit transparency norms.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and a comprehensive cookie consent banner is implemented, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No security.txt or incident response information is published, limiting transparency in vulnerability management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of Piwik Analytics is privacy-friendly compared to other analytics platforms. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit informational site but could be enhanced with additional security controls and transparency.
Recommendations
Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Publish a clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
Add contact information including emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
Create and publish a security.txt file to provide a formal channel for vulnerability disclosure.
Regularly review and update cookie and privacy compliance mechanisms to maintain GDPR adherence.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Beisheim Stiftung
Description
The website is the frontend for Beisheim Stiftung, a foundation with presence in Germany and Switzerland, providing information about its activities, funding criteria, and downloadable resources.
Key services
Funding criteria publication, Information dissemination, Downloadable resources for applicants
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
JavaScript, Nuxt.js, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Cookie consent banner with granular controls
Analytics and tracking
Services
Piwik Analytics (Matomo)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot session tracker
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management with detailed categories and user controls.
No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the HTML content.
No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
Website content is primarily informational and document/resource focused.
No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
No social media links detected in the provided HTML content.
Website uses Nuxt.js framework and custom CMS backend.
HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
WHOIS data is missing or domain is not registered publicly.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on Nuxt.js, a modern Vue.js framework, indicating a contemporary front-end technology stack. It uses a custom CMS backend hosted at cms.beisheim.com for content management and asset delivery. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, providing granular user control over cookie categories. The site loads multiple JavaScript bundles asynchronously, suggesting optimization for performance. However, no explicit hosting provider or CDN was identified from the HTML content. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and no structured data like JSON-LD detected. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and SEO.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with beisheim-stiftung.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review beisheim-stiftung.com.