GambleAware · Non-profit · United Kingdom
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.
GambleAware is a UK-based non-profit organization dedicated to providing free, confidential advice, tools, and support to individuals affected by gambling harms, including their families and friends. The organization operates the National Gambling Support Network, offering 24/7 phone and live chat support, and provides various self-help tools such as a gambling harms assessment and a support app. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and rich in relevant content, targeting a broad audience concerned with gambling-related issues in Great Britain. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Gleap for feedback. It uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates third-party services like GamCare for live chat support. The site demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, though explicit security headers are not detected. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR-aligned consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site shows a mature posture with encrypted communications and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of WHOIS registrant data reduces transparency and slightly impacts trust. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, serving an important social cause. Strategically, GambleAware should consider enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and improving WHOIS transparency to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention begambleaware.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for begambleaware.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with begambleaware.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review begambleaware.org.