Skip to main content

Security report for bea.lv

SIA “Bea” · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA “Bea” is a small retail business specializing in curtains and home textile products located in Riga, Latvia. The company offers a variety of products including curtains, stage curtains, blinds, fabrics, cushions, tablecloths, bed covers, and accessories. They also provide services such as design consultations, sewing, installation, and ecological fabric washing. The website targets local consumers and wholesale customers, presenting a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and social media presence. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. It uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Fancybox, and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for user tracking and analytics. The site is mobile optimized with a moderate performance profile. However, it lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features and does not explicitly provide privacy or terms of service pages. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent banner, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, no security headers were detected, and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits limits the ability to fully verify domain registration legitimacy, but the website content and business information appear consistent and trustworthy for a small local business. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and safe for general audiences, but improvements in security headers, privacy documentation, and WHOIS transparency would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bea.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on home textiles and curtains, serving both retail and wholesale customers primarily in Latvia. Their business model combines product sales with value-added services such as design consultation and installation, which may provide competitive differentiation. The presence of multiple partner brands suggests a well-established supplier and partnership network. The website content and structure indicate a stable local market position with potential for growth through enhanced digital presence and compliance. Revenue streams likely include direct sales and service fees. The company targets homeowners, interior designers, and wholesale buyers. The partnership ecosystem includes several European textile and curtain brands, indicating a broad sourcing strategy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected, minimizing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. The absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicates limited formal security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is partial, mainly through cookie consent, but lacks comprehensive privacy documentation. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, suitable for a small retail website but with room for improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to handle security issues effectively.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and CMS components to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Bea”
VAT number
LV47403004944
Registration number
47403004944
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “Bea”
Description
A curtain salon located in the heart of Riga offering curtains, fabrics, blinds, cushions, tablecloths, bed covers, and accessories. They provide design consultations, sewing, installation, and ecological fabric washing services.
Key services
Curtains, Stage curtains, Curtain rods, Blinds, Fabrics, Cushions, Tablecloths, Bed covers, Accessories, Design consultations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics, Cloudfront CDN, Mozello CMS (implied by URLs and scripts)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://www.bea.lv/)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  8. Website uses Mozello CMS and Amazon Cloudfront CDN.
  9. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  10. No security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Mozello CMS and uses a combination of jQuery, Fancybox, and other JavaScript libraries delivered via Amazon Cloudfront CDN. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile responsive and uses modern web fonts and CSS customizations. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. However, accessibility features are basic and SEO optimization could be improved with more meta tags and structured data. The absence of forms reduces complexity but also limits user engagement. Hosting on a CDN improves availability and load times. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small retail business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bea.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bea.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.