Skip to main content

Security report for bdn.lv

SIA “BDN” · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BDN Real Estate is a Latvian real estate company operating primarily through its website bdn.lv. The company offers real estate sales services and provides tools such as a floor calculator to assist customers. The website targets general audiences interested in real estate within Latvia and positions itself as a local service provider. The business appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2016, operating under the legal name SIA “BDN”. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins including WP Rocket for performance optimization, WPML for multilingual support, and Grand Cookie for cookie consent management. The site loads quickly, is mobile optimized, and uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate. However, some security headers are missing, which could be improved to enhance security posture. From a security perspective, the website demonstrates good practices such as enforcing HTTPS and implementing cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of an incident response page, security policy, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, BDN.lv is a professional and trustworthy real estate website with good technical implementation and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and WHOIS data availability would further strengthen its security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bdn.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BDN operates in the real estate sector in Latvia, focusing on property sales and related services. The company leverages digital tools such as a floor calculator to enhance customer engagement. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting local customers seeking real estate solutions. The website's multilingual support indicates an intent to serve both Latvian and Russian-speaking audiences. The presence of social media links and clear contact information supports customer outreach and trust building. The company appears to maintain a lean operation with no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The website content and structure suggest a focus on user experience and compliance with regional data protection regulations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent banners aligned with GDPR requirements, indicating a baseline security and privacy awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which could delay response to security incidents. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy reduces transparency and trust for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in proactive security measures and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish an incident response and security contact page to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Ensure WHOIS data is accessible and accurate to improve domain trustworthiness and legitimacy verification.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “BDN”
Description
BDN is a real estate company providing services related to property sales and floor calculation tools.
Key services
Real estate sales, Floor calculator tool
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, WP Rocket, FancyApps UI (Carousel, Fancybox), Grand Cookie plugin, WPML (multilingual)
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
WPML for multilingual support, Grand Cookie for cookie consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to real estate services in Latvia.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and social media.
  5. Uses modern WordPress CMS with performance optimization plugins.
  6. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  7. No terms of service or incident response information found.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; limits domain trust analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with a well-optimized tech stack including WP Rocket for caching and performance, WPML for multilingual capabilities, and FancyApps UI for interactive UI components. The site uses jQuery and several minified CSS and JS assets to improve load times. Lazy loading is implemented for images and scripts, contributing to fast performance. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and alternate language links. However, the absence of some security headers and limited hosting provider information are noted. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with good performance and user experience, but security hardening and transparency could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bdn.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bdn.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.