Skip to main content

Security report for bdl-wueho.de

Bund Der Landjugend – Württemberg-Hohenzollern e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Bund Der Landjugend – Württemberg-Hohenzollern e.V., a non-profit youth association focused on engaging young people in rural areas of the Württemberg-Hohenzollern region in Germany. The organization aims to preserve rural communities as attractive living spaces for youth, fostering community vitality and sustainability. The site uses WordPress with a modern theme and plugins, including WooCommerce and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The technical infrastructure is standard for non-profit organizations, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and CAPTCHA on forms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is limited, with no visible privacy or terms of service pages, though a cookie consent mechanism is present. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bdl-wueho.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a regional non-profit youth association targeting young people in rural Germany. Its business model centers on community engagement and event organization rather than commercial activities. The website supports this with event calendars and contact forms but lacks direct contact details like emails or phone numbers. The site’s market position is localized and community-focused, with no evident commercial partnerships or subsidiaries. The use of WooCommerce suggests some e-commerce capabilities, possibly for merchandise or event tickets. The organization maintains consistent branding and provides relevant content for its audience, though it could enhance transparency with more comprehensive policies and contact information.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses CAPTCHA to protect forms, which are positive security practices. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are found, limiting the organization's readiness to handle security incidents. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries, but regular updates and security hardening are recommended. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no detailed privacy policy, which could expose the organization to regulatory risks under GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Establish and communicate an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security readiness.
  4. Provide clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user support.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Bund Der Landjugend – Württemberg-Hohenzollern e.V.
Description
Wir, der Bund der Landjugend Württemberg-Hohenzollern (BdL), sind ein unabhängiger Jugendverband, offen für alle Jugendlichen im ländlichen Raum. Wir sind überzeugt, dass Dorf und Region als attraktive Lebensräume für junge Menschen erhalten bleiben müssen. Nur so bleibt unser ländlicher Raum lebendig und zukunftsfähig.
Key services
Youth engagement, Community development, Event organization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Contact Form 7, Booking Personal plugin, jQuery, Slider Revolution
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of CAPTCHA in contact forms (Contact Form 7 Image Captcha)
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit youth organization site
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism present via Borlabs Cookie plugin
  4. Contact form present but no direct email or phone number found in the HTML
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  6. No explicit data protection officer contact found
  7. Good use of HTTPS and modern plugins
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  9. No advertising or tracking scripts detected beyond standard plugins
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and several plugins including WooCommerce, Contact Form 7 with image captcha, and Booking Personal. It uses jQuery and Slider Revolution for UI enhancements. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified but uses UI-DNS name servers. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but no advanced structured data like JSON-LD detected. Accessibility features are minimal. The site uses HTTPS with valid SSL but lacks advanced security headers. Overall, the technical stack is typical for a small non-profit organization but could benefit from modernization and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bdl-wueho.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bdl-wueho.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.