Skip to main content

Security report for bbstudija.lv

Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website bbstudija.lv represents a small architectural firm or studio based in Latvia, showcasing a portfolio of various architectural projects including office complexes, residential buildings, commercial centers, and competition entries primarily located in Riga, Jūrmala, and other Latvian cities. The site is primarily informational, targeting potential clients or partners interested in architectural design services. The business model appears to focus on project presentation and possibly client acquisition through portfolio display. Technically, the website uses a custom CMS with JavaScript and jQuery libraries. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or third-party integrations such as analytics or marketing tools. The site structure is clear and navigation is straightforward, but lacks interactive elements such as contact forms. From a security perspective, the site does not expose any obvious vulnerabilities but lacks critical security headers and visible HTTPS enforcement cannot be confirmed from the data provided. There are no privacy or cookie policies, no contact information, and no incident response or security policy disclosures, which limits compliance with GDPR and other regulations. The WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, preventing full domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, the site appears legitimate but basic in security and compliance maturity. The overall risk is moderate with recommendations to implement HTTPS, add privacy and cookie policies, provide clear contact information, and enhance security headers to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bbstudija.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

bbstudija.lv operates in the Real Estate and Architectural sector within Latvia, focusing on architectural design and project portfolio presentation. The company targets local clients interested in commercial and residential building projects. The business model is service-oriented, showcasing completed and ongoing projects to attract new clients. The site does not reveal revenue streams or partnerships, indicating a small-scale operation. The lack of contact details and policies suggests limited digital maturity. Growth potential exists through improved digital presence and compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low to moderate security posture. HTTPS presence is unconfirmed, and no security headers are detected, which exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The lack of visible security best practices and monitoring tools suggests the need for a security audit and implementation of standard protections to safeguard business reputation and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incidents.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Conduct a security audit to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities and improve incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website showcases architectural projects including office complexes, residential buildings, commercial centers, and competitions primarily in Riga, Jūrmala, Ventspils, and other Latvian locations.
Key services
Architectural design, Project portfolio presentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Latvian language targeting local audience.
  2. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links found in the HTML content.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No forms or data collection fields present on the homepage content.
  5. No external links or third-party domains referenced in href attributes.
  6. Uses jQuery and custom JavaScript files hosted on the same domain.
  7. No visible security headers or meta tags related to security.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD) or schema.org markup found.
  9. Website content is primarily a portfolio of architectural projects with images and titles.
  10. No signs of advertising, tracking, or analytics services detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and jQuery. The site loads multiple JavaScript files hosted locally, indicating self-managed infrastructure. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. SEO is minimal with basic meta tags and Open Graph tags but no structured data or JSON-LD markup. Accessibility features are limited. No third-party analytics or marketing tools are detected, which reduces tracking but also limits business intelligence capabilities. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements, SEO enhancements, and integration of analytics for better user insights.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bbstudija.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bbstudija.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.