Skip to main content

Security report for bayoudogs.org

Visiting Nurses Association of America (V.N.A.A.) · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Visiting Nurses Association of America (V.N.A.A.) is featured on a professional and comprehensive website hosted under the Young Survival Coalition domain, a reputable non-profit organization focused on young adults facing breast cancer. The site provides detailed information about V.N.A.A.'s advocacy, education, and community-based home health services. The target audience includes young women diagnosed with breast cancer and their support networks. The website demonstrates a strong market position within the non-profit healthcare advocacy sector, offering key services such as resource directories and community support. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including FusionCMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google Maps API. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with a clean and consistent branding approach. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, security headers are not detected, and privacy compliance could be enhanced by implementing explicit cookie consent mechanisms and clearer GDPR indicators. The WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is typical for non-profit organizations, and no suspicious patterns were found, supporting the site's legitimacy. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and well-maintained, serving its community effectively. Strategic improvements in security headers and privacy compliance would further strengthen its posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bayoudogs.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention bayoudogs.org, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for bayoudogs.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a non-profit entity within the healthcare advocacy sector, focusing on young breast cancer survivors. Its business model revolves around advocacy, education, and community support, leveraging partnerships and fundraising campaigns such as Tour de Pink and birthday pledges. The website's integration with partner domains and social media channels indicates a robust ecosystem for outreach and engagement. The presence of certifications like the Candid Guidestar Gold Transparency further enhances credibility. Growth indicators include active event promotion and resource expansion. The organization's operations appear stable with a medium-sized footprint in the US market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. The use of reputable analytics and tracking tools is balanced with some privacy concerns due to lack of anonymization in IP tracking. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or security policy pages were found, which could be added to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and clearer privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Review analytics configurations to enable IP anonymization and minimize privacy risks.
  5. Optimize website performance for faster loading times and improved user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Young Survival Coalition
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Visiting Nurses Association of America (V.N.A.A.)
Description
The Visiting Nurse Associations of America (V.N.A.A.) is a national association that supports, promotes and advocates for community-based, nonprofit home health and hospice providers that care for all individuals regardless of complexity of condition or ability to pay.
Key services
Advocacy, Education, Collaboration, Resource directory
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Maps API, FusionCMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel with anonymizeIp false

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and professional.
  2. WHOIS data is not available publicly, indicating privacy protection.
  3. Site uses modern analytics and tracking tools.
  4. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend improvement.
  5. Clear contact information and social media presence.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected.
  7. Good SEO and accessibility features observed.
  8. Google Maps integration present but with a warning about API key usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on FusionCMS, a modern content management system, and integrates multiple third-party services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Google Maps API. The HTML structure is valid and includes proper meta tags for SEO and social media sharing. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in map API usage and script loading. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could be enhanced with additional security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bayoudogs.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bayoudogs.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.