Skip to main content

Security report for baufonds.lv

SIA BAUFONDS EU · Real Estate · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BAUFONDS.EU is a Latvian company specializing in the commissioning and legalization of houses and buildings, including the legalization of illegal reconstructions of summer houses, apartments, and private houses. The company coordinates all necessary specialists such as certified electricians, chimney sweeps, surveyors, architects, and others to ensure full project legalization. The website is well-structured, professionally designed, and provides comprehensive information about their services, pricing, and contact options. Customer testimonials indicate a positive market reputation. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries, Google Maps API, and multiple analytics and tracking tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling, though it lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website and business appear legitimate and trustworthy with room for security and privacy improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching baufonds.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the Real Estate sector, focusing on building commissioning and legalization services in Latvia. It targets property owners who need to legalize their buildings to avoid penalties and facilitate sales or taxation. The business model is service-oriented, coordinating multiple specialists to deliver end-to-end legalization solutions. Positive customer feedback and detailed service descriptions suggest a strong local market position. The company maintains active social media presence and uses multiple marketing and analytics tools to engage customers. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company is small-sized with a clear focus on Latvian market needs.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure POST methods for form submissions, including GDPR-compliant consent checkboxes. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of an incident response or security policy page and no visible vulnerability disclosure mechanism indicate limited formal security governance. Tracking and analytics are extensive but appear standard for marketing purposes. Overall, the security posture is moderate with opportunities for improvement in headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply fully with EU cookie regulations and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and tracking scripts to minimize security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA BAUFONDS EU
Registration number
LV40203339961
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA BAUFONDS EU
Description
BAU Fonds provides services related to the commissioning and legalization of houses and buildings, including legalization of illegal reconstructions of summer houses, apartments, and private houses. They coordinate all involved specialists necessary for project legalization such as certified electricians, energy audits, chimney sweeps, surveyors, geologists, architects, and building designers.
Key services
Building commissioning, Legalization of illegal reconstructions, Document preparation and coordination, Technical inspections and certifications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Google Maps API, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form submission via POST
  • GDPR compliance with explicit consent checkbox

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. Business provides specialized services in building commissioning and legalization.
  3. Contact information is complete and includes company registration number.
  4. Multiple customer testimonials with high ratings are present.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  6. No explicit privacy or cookie banners visible, but GDPR policy PDF is linked.
  7. Uses modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  8. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including jQuery, jQuery UI, Google Maps API, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Hosting provider details are not available. Accessibility is basic but functional. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation is lacking, representing a technical risk. Overall, the infrastructure supports business needs effectively with room for security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with baufonds.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review baufonds.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.