Skip to main content

Security report for basisportal.de

edv plan GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

edv plan GmbH is a small regional IT service provider and web agency based in Germany, specializing in web development, programming, IT support, and consulting services. Their website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of their services and a portfolio of projects, targeting businesses and public administration in the Ostprignitz-Ruppin region. The company emphasizes clear communication and local presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and includes modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery. Cookie management is handled via the Borlabs Cookie plugin, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, but lacks some security headers and published incident response policies. Overall, the website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence for a small business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching basisportal.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
45
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
85
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention basisportal.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for basisportal.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on web and software solutions tailored to local clients including businesses and government entities. Their portfolio showcases diverse projects, indicating a strong regional footprint and client trust. The business model revolves around service delivery with a focus on personalized support and clear communication. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The presence of privacy and cookie policies aligns with GDPR requirements, enhancing credibility. The absence of terms of service and explicit security policies suggests areas for maturity improvement. The company leverages partnerships with local entities as seen in logos and project references, strengthening its market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of WordPress and third-party plugins necessitates vigilant patch management to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing a vulnerability disclosure process.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a clear incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses).
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to minimize risk from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
edv plan GmbH
Description
Wir verstehen die Technik. Sie verstehen uns.
Key services
Webseiten und Web-Shops, Corporate-Design, individuelle Software, Schnittstellen, Datenbankanwendungen, Maßgeschneiderte Hardwarelösungen, IT-Support, Beratung
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, WordPress, Divi Theme, Borlabs Cookie plugin
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear contact information and legal pages are present.
  3. Uses WordPress with Divi theme and Borlabs Cookie plugin for cookie management.
  4. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. No suspicious or malicious external domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, a popular and feature-rich framework for web design. It utilizes jQuery for client-side scripting and Borlabs Cookie for cookie management and GDPR compliance. Hosting is provided by rzone.de as indicated by the nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with caching and optimization plugins likely in use (e.g., autoptimize CSS). No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but security header implementation is lacking. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a stable and professional web presence suitable for a small IT service business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with basisportal.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review basisportal.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.