Skip to main content

Security report for bamawrestling.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is primarily a Matomo analytics platform login page for bamawrestling.com, indicating it is used for internal analytics purposes rather than public business engagement. The site is technically sound with HTTPS enabled and uses Cloudflare DNS services, but lacks DNSSEC and does not provide public-facing privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies. No contact or security incident response information is available, limiting transparency and compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. The content is minimal and focused on analytics functionality, resulting in a low content quality score. Overall, the site appears to be a legitimate analytics dashboard rather than a commercial or customer-facing website.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching bamawrestling.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the nature of the content, there is limited business intelligence to extract. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses Cloudflare DNS, consistent with a legitimate small-scale operation. The business model revolves around providing or using Matomo analytics services, likely for internal monitoring. No external partnerships, contact details, or marketing information are present to assess market positioning or growth indicators.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS and domain status protections that prevent unauthorized domain changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security posture. The lack of published privacy and security policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Security best practices such as enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers are recommended to enhance protection.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add contact information and a security incident response policy to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Improve website content quality and user experience if the site is intended for public access.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Matomo is a free/libre analytics platform
Key services
web analytics, data privacy focused analytics
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Matomo analytics platform, JavaScript, PHP
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo tracking
Marketing tools
Matomo analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is a Matomo analytics login page, not the actual business site content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content.
  3. No contact information or security policies are present.
  4. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but lacks DNSSEC.
  5. No external social media or contact emails found in the content.
  6. Website appears to be a private analytics dashboard rather than a public business site.
  7. No forms for public contact or user registration detected.
  8. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected.
  9. Content is minimal and technical, focused on analytics platform usage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on the Matomo analytics platform, utilizing JavaScript and PHP technologies. It is hosted with DNS services provided by Cloudflare and registered via GoDaddy. The site uses HTTPS with a valid certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. Performance appears moderate with basic mobile optimization. The site lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. No CMS was detected, and the site serves primarily as an analytics dashboard rather than a content-rich website. Technical debt is minimal given the site's limited scope, but modernization opportunities include enabling DNSSEC and improving privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with bamawrestling.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review bamawrestling.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.