Skip to main content

Security report for balttop.lv

BALTTOP · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

BALTTOP is a small retail business based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in construction and heating materials such as fuel briquettes, wood pellets, and OSB boards. The website is primarily in Russian and targets local customers including construction companies and private individuals seeking eco-friendly heating solutions. The business operates a warehouse-store model offering competitive prices. Technically, the website uses legacy JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.8.3 and Owl Carousel, with Google Analytics and Tag Manager integrated for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized and well-structured, though some modernization of the tech stack is advisable. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS usage is assumed but no security headers were detected, and the use of outdated libraries presents potential vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies, which is a notable gap given GDPR applicability in Latvia. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust analysis. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security and privacy practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching balttop.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

BALTTOP holds a regional market position in Latvia as a supplier of construction and heating materials, focusing on environmentally friendly fuel products. Its business model revolves around retail and wholesale sales through a physical warehouse and online presence. The company leverages social media channels like Facebook and Instagram for marketing and customer engagement. Revenue streams likely derive from sales of briquettes, pellets, and OSB boards. The target customer base includes both commercial and residential clients. The website content and contact details suggest a transparent and accessible business operation. However, the lack of detailed corporate information such as VAT or registration numbers limits deeper business intelligence insights. The absence of privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. There are no identified partnerships or subsidiaries from the website data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage implied but not explicitly confirmed. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) introduces potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited. No sensitive data exposure was found in the HTML content. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. There is no evidence of an incident response policy or security certifications. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with room for significant improvement in modern security best practices and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to address GDPR compliance.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to reduce vulnerability risks.
  3. Configure and deploy essential security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Verify and enforce HTTPS across the entire website to ensure secure data transmission.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and consider publishing security contact information to improve trust and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
BALTTOP
Description
Магазин-склад строительных и отопительных товаров по выгодным ценам. Основные товары: топливные брикеты, древесные гранулы, пиломатериалы, OSB плиты.
Key services
Продажа топливных брикетов, Продажа древесных гранул, Продажа OSB плит и пиломатериалов
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (not explicitly stated but Google Analytics scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Russian language targeting Latvian market.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  5. Use of outdated jQuery version may pose security risks.
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking with no visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  9. Website content is relevant and professionally presented for a small retail business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using classic web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery 1.8.3 and jQuery UI, which are outdated and may pose security risks. Owl Carousel is used for image sliders, enhancing user experience. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes. The site is mobile responsive and uses Google Fonts for typography. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident from the source. Performance appears moderate with no obvious blocking scripts or heavy resources. SEO is supported by meta tags including keywords and description, but no structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) was found. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site would benefit from modernization of its tech stack and improved security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with balttop.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review balttop.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.